From: lijiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, vmcoreinfo: Export sme_me_mask value to vmcoreinfo
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:57:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4bae45c-e52a-7fbb-6b74-5de12ea47368@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026222517.GB26927@nazgul.tnic>
在 2018年10月27日 06:25, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 06:24:40PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>> But we need the MSR value from the panic kernel environment, not while
>> the production kernel is still running, right?
>
> Actually, we need only the encryption bit number (and it should be 0
> otherwise to denote SME wasn't enabled).
>
Thanks for your comment.
For this patch, it really needs only the encryption bit number.
For the AMD machine with SME feature, the OS or HV sets bit 47 of a
physical address to 1 in the page table entry to indicate the page
should be encrypted.
Thanks.
Lianbo
> I guess something like
>
> VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(sme_mask);
>
> which gets written by the kexec-ed kernel.
>
>> If so, then this reminds me that I have wanted for a long time to store
>> more of the hardware state in a vmcore NOTE after a kernel crash ...
>> control registers, MSRs and whatnot. Of course, this would be a
>> long-term project, but I wonder what other people think about it in
>> general.
>
> I guess that sounds like a good idea - the more relevant hw info for
> debugging, the better. Determining the important MSRs to save would need
> a bit of a pondering over though. For example, some MSRs are per-core,
> some per-socket, etc...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-27 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 9:36 Lianbo Jiang
2018-10-26 9:43 ` Boris Petkov
2018-10-26 12:32 ` lijiang
2018-10-26 16:24 ` Petr Tesarik
2018-10-26 22:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-27 2:57 ` lijiang [this message]
2018-10-27 8:13 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-27 9:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-27 9:39 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-27 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-27 11:08 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-27 13:17 ` Boris Petkov
2018-10-27 14:41 ` lijiang
2018-10-27 14:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-29 7:59 ` lijiang
2018-10-29 8:31 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-29 9:29 ` lijiang
2018-10-29 9:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-29 10:12 ` lijiang
2018-10-29 11:44 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-29 13:41 ` lijiang
2018-10-29 13:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-30 4:46 ` lijiang
2018-10-30 5:09 ` Dave Young
2018-10-30 9:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-30 9:23 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-31 2:26 ` lijiang
2018-10-31 2:47 ` Dave Young
2018-10-31 7:43 ` lijiang
2018-10-31 10:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-01 15:01 ` Kazuhito Hagio
2018-10-26 16:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-27 2:19 ` lijiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4bae45c-e52a-7fbb-6b74-5de12ea47368@redhat.com \
--to=lijiang@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome