From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/16] sched/core: Queue blocked donor onto sleeping owner for chain-wakeup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:21:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a534560e-3225-4f6f-9376-dfaaedf33d83@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ao8SOkBYH1uLh6Sa@gpd4>
Hello Andrea,
On 8/26/2026 9:50 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
>> +static void proxy_enqueue_on_owner(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *owner,
>> + struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
>> + lockdep_assert_held(&owner->blocked_lock);
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(!p->on_rq);
>> + WARN_ON(p->sleeping_owner);
>> +
>> + WRITE_ONCE(p->sleeping_owner, owner);
>> + list_add(&p->blocked_node, &owner->blocked_head);
>> + proxy_resched_idle(rq);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Order against __activate_blocked_task_slowpath() checking
>> + * owner->blocked_list after setting owner->on_rq.
>
> This should be owner->blocked_head not owner->blocked_list, right?
Correct! My bad. Also the slow-path is proxy_activate_blocked_task()
that gets introduced in Patch 14. I missed renaming it here.
And ack on other comments too above.
>
>> + */
>> + smp_mb();
>> +
>> + if (READ_ONCE(owner->on_rq)) {
>> + /*
>> + * owner has woken up and may miss activating us.
>> + * Remove ourself from "owner->blocked_head" and try
>> + * find_proxy_task() again considering the owner's
>> + * new state.
>> + */
>> + __proxy_dequeue_from_owner(p);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Owner is fully blocked. __activate_blocked_task_slowpath()
>> + * will see us on the list during wakeup and DTRT.
>> + */
>> + block_task(rq, p, READ_ONCE(p->__state));
>> +}
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 6:28 [RFC PATCH 00/16][PoC] sched/core: Alternate approach to sleeping-owner handling in PROXY_EXEC K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] sched/core: Break activation of blocked task into a separate helper K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] sched/core: Use enqueue/dequeue flags instead of task_on_rq_migrating() K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Use enqueue flags for DO_ATTACH in update_load_avg() K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 15:36 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] sched/core: Activate blocked donor when no owner is found K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 15:56 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-26 17:20 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-28 6:04 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] sched/core: Do not queue blocked donor on a delayed owner K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] sched/core: Queue blocked donor onto sleeping owner for chain-wakeup K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 16:20 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-27 3:51 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] sched/core: Avoid delaying blocked donors queued on sleeping owner K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] sched/deadline: Prepare for blocking and proxy activation with MIGRATING flag K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] sched/core: Track CPU where the task was blocked on K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] sched/core: Introduce p->is_linked to track if task is queued on sleeping owner K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] sched/core: Prepare to inspect ->is_linked alongside ->on_rq during wakeup K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] sched:core: Add MIGRATING flags when blocking and activating linked donors K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] sched/core: Use p->is_linked state to unlink from sleeping owner early K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] sched/core: Introduce chain-wakeup to activate blocked donors K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] locking/mutex: Track locks owned by a task in a per-task counter K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] sched/core: Set activation of non lock-holders to fast-path K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a534560e-3225-4f6f-9376-dfaaedf33d83@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®