mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/16] sched/core: Use enqueue/dequeue flags instead of task_on_rq_migrating()
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:28:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826062901.2137-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826062901.2137-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

With the blocked task activation path converted to use a separate
helper, add the DEQUEUE_MIGRATING and ENQUEUE_MIGRATING flag in
deactivate_task() and activate_task().

Avoid checking task_on_rq_migrating() in the sched class callbacks and
instead depend on flags to know if the enqueue/dequeue is a part of a
task migration.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     | 7 ++-----
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 ------
 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 6 +++---
 kernel/sched/stats.h    | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7d1ffcc33fed..4cd69b08b415 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2218,9 +2218,6 @@ inline bool dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 
 static void __activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 {
-	if (task_on_rq_migrating(p))
-		flags |= ENQUEUE_MIGRATED;
-
 	enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(p->on_rq, TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED);
@@ -2229,7 +2226,7 @@ static void __activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 
 void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags)
 {
-	__activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
+	__activate_task(rq, p, en_flags | ENQUEUE_MIGRATING);
 }
 
 static void activate_blocked_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags)
@@ -2249,7 +2246,7 @@ void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	 * dequeue_task() and cleared *after* enqueue_task().
 	 */
 
-	dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
+	dequeue_task(rq, p, flags | DEQUEUE_MIGRATING);
 }
 
 static void block_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long task_state)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 3e89b3abeb27..9abda560c633 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2530,9 +2530,6 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	check_schedstat_required();
 	update_stats_wait_start_dl(dl_rq, dl_se);
 
-	if (task_on_rq_migrating(p))
-		flags |= ENQUEUE_MIGRATING;
-
 	enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se, flags);
 
 	if (dl_server(dl_se))
@@ -2552,9 +2549,6 @@ static bool dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 {
 	update_curr_dl(rq);
 
-	if (task_on_rq_migrating(p))
-		flags |= DEQUEUE_MIGRATING;
-
 	dequeue_dl_entity(&p->dl, flags);
 	if (!p->dl.dl_throttled && !dl_server(&p->dl))
 		dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6d2fa0cd7777..244f1c68c041 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6265,7 +6265,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 
 	action = UPDATE_TG;
 	if (entity_is_task(se)) {
-		if (task_on_rq_migrating(task_of(se)))
+		if (flags & DEQUEUE_MIGRATING)
 			action |= DO_DETACH;
 
 		if (sleep && !(flags & DEQUEUE_DELAYED))
@@ -6663,7 +6663,7 @@ static void dequeue_throttled_task(struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	 * task is migrating off its old cfs_rq, detach
 	 * the task's load from its old cfs_rq.
 	 */
-	if (task_on_rq_migrating(p))
+	if (flags & DEQUEUE_MIGRATING)
 		detach_task_cfs_rq(p);
 }
 
@@ -7981,7 +7981,7 @@ static int dequeue_entities(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 			break;
 		}
 		flags |= DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
-		flags &= ~(DEQUEUE_DELAYED | DEQUEUE_SPECIAL);
+		flags &= ~(DEQUEUE_DELAYED | DEQUEUE_SPECIAL | DEQUEUE_MIGRATING);
 	}
 
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/stats.h b/kernel/sched/stats.h
index ebe0a7765f98..d0d9cff168a2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/stats.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/stats.h
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline void psi_enqueue(struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 
 	if (p->se.sched_delayed) {
 		/* CPU migration of "sleeping" task */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATED));
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATING));
 		if (p->in_memstall)
 			set |= TSK_MEMSTALL;
 		if (p->in_iowait)
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26  6:28 [RFC PATCH 00/16][PoC] sched/core: Alternate approach to sleeping-owner handling in PROXY_EXEC K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] sched/core: Break activation of blocked task into a separate helper K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Use enqueue flags for DO_ATTACH in update_load_avg() K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 15:36   ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] sched/core: Activate blocked donor when no owner is found K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 15:56   ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-26 17:20     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-28  6:04       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-31 15:07         ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-16  4:16           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-16  3:29   ` John Stultz
2026-09-16  4:16     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] sched/core: Do not queue blocked donor on a delayed owner K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] sched/core: Queue blocked donor onto sleeping owner for chain-wakeup K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26 16:20   ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-27  3:51     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] sched/core: Avoid delaying blocked donors queued on sleeping owner K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] sched/deadline: Prepare for blocking and proxy activation with MIGRATING flag K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] sched/core: Track CPU where the task was blocked on K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-16  5:52   ` John Stultz
2026-09-16  6:29     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] sched/core: Introduce p->is_linked to track if task is queued on sleeping owner K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] sched/core: Prepare to inspect ->is_linked alongside ->on_rq during wakeup K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] sched:core: Add MIGRATING flags when blocking and activating linked donors K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] sched/core: Use p->is_linked state to unlink from sleeping owner early K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] sched/core: Introduce chain-wakeup to activate blocked donors K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-15  5:48   ` John Stultz
2026-08-26  6:28 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] locking/mutex: Track locks owned by a task in a per-task counter K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-26  6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] sched/core: Set activation of non lock-holders to fast-path K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-16  5:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16][PoC] sched/core: Alternate approach to sleeping-owner handling in PROXY_EXEC John Stultz
2026-09-16  6:10   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-16  6:23     ` John Stultz
2026-09-16  6:59       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-16 17:57   ` John Stultz
2026-09-17  5:22     ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260826062901.2137-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®