mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Sivansh Gupta <sivansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mailbox: qcom-cpucp: read mbox hardware register using readq()
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 08:29:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a56ef682-c28b-42f4-b23e-25bf7d7879c2@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179377342626.494575.14471451763190105361.b4-reply@b4>

On 11/4/26 7:23 AM, Sivansh Gupta wrote:
> On 2026-11-02 16:56 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/13/26 2:32 PM, Sivansh Gupta wrote:
>>> On 2026-09-30 11:55 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 9/28/26 7:29 AM, Sivansh Gupta wrote:
>>>>> Mailbox hardware registers are 64 bit wide, but the interrupt handler
>>>>> currently reads only 32 bits with readl() at offset 0x4 (upper 32
>>>>> bits). This returns an incorrect value, while reading using readq()
>>>>> returns the expected value.
>>>>>
>>>>> Use readq() to access the 64 bit register and pass the expected value
>>>>> to the mailbox client.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 0e2a9a03106c ("mailbox: Add support for QTI CPUCP mailbox controller")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sivansh Gupta <sivansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v3:
>>>>> - Removed references to an out of tree driver to focus on the incorrect
>>>>>   value returned by readl()
>>>>>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/93ce8588-7500-45da-9b9a-424c202590cf@oss.qualcomm.com/#t
>>>>>
>>>>> v2:
>>>>> - Expanded the commit message to explain why this change is required.
>>>>>
>>>>>  drivers/mailbox/qcom-cpucp-mbox.c | 2 +-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-cpucp-mbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-cpucp-mbox.c
>>>>> index 862e45e8fbd5..0b584d9aad6c 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-cpucp-mbox.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-cpucp-mbox.c
>>>>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_cpucp_mbox_irq_fn(int irq, void *data)
>>>>>  	status = readq(cpucp->rx_base + APSS_CPUCP_RX_MBOX_STAT);
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	for_each_set_bit(i, (unsigned long *)&status, cpucp->mbox.num_chans) {
>>>>> -		u32 val = readl(cpucp->rx_base + APSS_CPUCP_RX_MBOX_CMD(i) + APSS_CPUCP_MBOX_CMD_OFF);
>>>>
>>>> This still retains the writel() later on
>>>
>>> This is intentional, currently the existing mbox client(s) assume 32 bits
>>> writes instead of 64 bits, changing to 64 bits here would require all
>>> mbox clients to be updated to send 64 bits.
>>> Currently there is only 1 upstream client (arm_scmi).
>>>
>>>>> +		u64 val = readq(cpucp->rx_base + APSS_CPUCP_RX_MBOX_CMD(i));
>>>>
>>>> This will alter the indices of the mailbox channels, but it's ""fine""
>>>> because it's always zero for the existing platforms..
>>>>
>>>> Konrad
>>>
>>> I am unsure what you mean here. The channel registers are spaced 8 bytes
>>> apart. In the old code, we used to read each channel's upper 32 bits
>>> (channel base + 4 bytes), in the new code we will be reading the entire
>>> 8 bytes.
>>> If this is not what you meant, please let me know!
>>
>> You're right, please remove the leftover define
> 
> Hey, APSS_CPUCP_MBOX_CMD_OFF is intentionally used in 
> qcom_cpucp_mbox_send_data  as it is still using writel instead of writeq, 
> as we discussed.
> 
> Also, I have since learned that this patch has already been picked up!
> 
> Cheers, Sivansh

Ok, all is well that ends well

Konrad

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28  5:29 Sivansh Gupta
2026-09-29  9:25 ` Sibi Sankar
2026-09-30  9:55 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-10-13 12:32   ` Sivansh Gupta
2026-10-28  9:50     ` Sivansh Gupta
2026-11-02 15:56     ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-11-04  6:23       ` Sivansh Gupta
2026-11-04  7:29         ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a56ef682-c28b-42f4-b23e-25bf7d7879c2@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sivansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®