Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add TI ADS1018/ADS1118

[David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>]

On 11/22/25 3:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/11/2025 23:40, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 11/21/25 2:56 PM, Kurt Borja wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On Fri Nov 21, 2025 at 2:10 PM -05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 21/11/2025 18:16, Kurt Borja wrote:
>>>>> Add documentation for Texas Instruments ADS1018 and ADS1118
>>>>> analog-to-digital converters.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> You did not test it before sending, so no full review but few nits to
>>>> save you one round of reviews:
>>>
>>> My bad! I will fix the errors. Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>> +  interrupts:
>>>>> +    description: DOUT/DRDY (Data Out/Data Ready) line.
>>>>> +    maxitems: 1
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  drdy-gpios:
>>>>> +    description:
>>>>> +      Extra GPIO line connected to DOUT/DRDY (Data Out/Data Ready). This allows
>>>>> +      distinguishing between latched and real DRDY IRQs.
>>>>
>>>> I have feeling that you miss proper handling of IRQs (e.g. active level)
>>>> on your board.
>>>
>>> Can you elaborate? Should I specify active level here?
>>>
>>>>
>> The problem is not about the levels. It is rather that the behavior of the
>> interrupt when disabled/masked is different on different interrupt controllers.
>>
>> On some controllers, if an event happens while disabled/masked, it "remembers"
>> that and will trigger the interrupt as soon as it is enabled even if the
>> condition doesn't exist anymore. Not a great hardware design IMHO, but there
>> is real hardware that does this.
> 
> Isn't it misconfiguration of trigger as I said before? It should be for
> example edge, instead of level?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

No. It it still works like this for edge triggers.