From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/fred: Fix the FRED RSP0 MSR out of sync with its per CPU cache
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 21:10:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6bc203b-b1e2-4da1-b1f4-1a61bb35d931@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7bc02bd-035b-4930-a569-3438b47ade19@intel.com>
On 08/01/2025 8:14 pm, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 1/7/25 18:36, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>> + * Another option is to leave the FRED RSP0 MSR as-is, because the RESET
>> + * state of FRED MSRs is zero and INIT does not change the value of the
>> + * FRED MSRs in a CPU offline/online cycle. But it doesn't seem safe to
>> + * depend on the properties of INIT as that's way too many things that
>> + * could cause bugs.
> Wouldn't that also open us up to kexec problems? If the last kernel
> (maybe not even Linux) left RSP0 set, then the current kernel might
> eventually try to run userspace with the old kernel's RSP0 value.
That's why the init code needs to write every control MSR, even if it's
filling in 0 because it doesn't want to use the feature.
The job of the init code is to go from an unknown state into a good
state, not from the INIT/#RESET state.
Or someone could finally write down an ABI for Kexec which details who's
responsibility it is :)
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 2:36 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-01-08 3:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-01-08 20:14 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-08 21:10 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2025-01-08 22:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-08 23:32 ` Xin Li
2025-01-09 9:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-01-09 18:48 ` Xin Li
2025-01-08 23:04 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-08 23:32 ` Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6bc203b-b1e2-4da1-b1f4-1a61bb35d931@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®