From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Awan,
Arsalan" <Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com>,
"Hombourger, Cedric" <Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com>,
"Farnsworth, Wade" <wade_farnsworth@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: watchdog: sp5100_tco support for AMD V/R/E series
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:18:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a70578a9-4e55-602b-68fe-56a01805965e@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e270546-7962-932b-2e4c-3c833b7d4b30@siemens.com>
On 9/7/20 8:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 07.09.20 17:31, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 9/7/20 4:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Arsalan reported that the upstream driver for sp5100_tco does not work
>>> for embedded Ryzen. Meanwhile, I was able to confirm that on an R1505G:
>>>
>>> [ 11.607251] sp5100_tco: SP5100/SB800 TCO WatchDog Timer Driver
>>> [ 11.607337] sp5100-tco sp5100-tco: Using 0xfed80b00 for watchdog MMIO address
>>> [ 11.607344] sp5100-tco sp5100-tco: Watchdog hardware is disabled
>>>
>>> ..and fix it:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>>> index 85e9664318c9..5482154fde42 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>>> @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ static void tco_timer_enable(struct sp5100_tco *tco)
>>> /* Set the Watchdog timer resolution to 1 sec and enable */
>>> sp5100_tco_update_pm_reg8(EFCH_PM_DECODEEN3,
>>> ~EFCH_PM_WATCHDOG_DISABLE,
>>> - EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_SECOND_RES);
>>> + EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_SECOND_RES |
>>> + EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_WDT_TMREN);
>>
>> Confusing. The register in question is a 32-bit register, but only a byte
>> is written into it. Bit 24-25 are supposed to be the resolution, bit 25-26
>> set to 0 enable the watchdog. Bit 7 is supposed to enable MMIO decoding.
>> This is from AMD Publication 52740. So something in the existing code
>> is (or seems to be) wrong, but either case I don't see how setting bit 7
>> (or 31 ?) would enable the watchdog hardware.
>>
>> Hmm, I wrote that code. Guess I'll need to to spend some time figuring out
>> what is going on.
>
> The logic came from [1] which inspired [2] - that's where I pointed out
> the large overlap with the existing upstream driver. I would love to see
> all that consolidated.
>
> BTW, the R1505G is family 0x17. Maybe something changed there, and that
> bit 7 was just reserved/ignored so far. ENOSPECS
>
Thanks for the pointers.
I think you are talking about bit 31. Bit 7 is and was WatchdogTmrEn, but that
supposedly only enables watchdog timer memory access at 0xfeb00000. From what
I glance from the other drivers, the existing code is wrong. It should set
the disable and resolution bits in register offset 3 (bit 24..27), not 0.
In other words, EFCH_PM_DECODEEN3 should be defined as 0x03, not as 0x00.
Which actually makes sense from the name.
Playing with my hardware, turns out that setting bit 7 in EFCH_PM_DECODEEN
(register offset 0) does indeed enable the watchdog. I'll need to check
if it actually works. Either case, -ENOSPECS is really a problem here.
Guenter
> Jan
>
> [1]
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-amd/commit/meta-amd-bsp/recipes-kernel/amd-wdt/files/amd_wdt.c?id=cd760c9f04d276382a0f5156dabdb766594ace56
> [2]
> https://github.com/siemens/efibootguard/commit/3a702aa96d193f26571ea4e70db29ef01a0d4d5f
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-07 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-07 11:20 Jan Kiszka
2020-09-07 15:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-07 15:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-09-07 19:18 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2020-09-07 20:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-09 16:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-10 6:09 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a70578a9-4e55-602b-68fe-56a01805965e@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com \
--cc=Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wade_farnsworth@mentor.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®