mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Marco Crivellari" <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 20:40:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8cdeb85-2629-440d-9c11-69f6e19f8cb6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829154814.47015-15-frederic@kernel.org>

On 8/29/25 11:47 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Until now, HK_TYPE_DOMAIN used to only include boot defined isolated
> CPUs passed through isolcpus= boot option. Users interested in also
> knowing the runtime defined isolated CPUs through cpuset must use
> different APIs: cpuset_cpu_is_isolated(), cpu_is_isolated(), etc...
>
> There are many drawbacks to that approach:
>
> 1) Most interested subsystems want to know about all isolated CPUs, not
>    just those defined on boot time.
>
> 2) cpuset_cpu_is_isolated() / cpu_is_isolated() are not synchronized with
>    concurrent cpuset changes.
>
> 3) Further cpuset modifications are not propagated to subsystems
>
> Solve 1) and 2) and centralize all isolated CPUs within the
> HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask.
>
> Subsystems can rely on RCU to synchronize against concurrent changes.
>
> The propagation mentioned in 3) will be handled in further patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
>   include/linux/sched/isolation.h |  4 +-
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c          |  2 +
>   kernel/sched/isolation.c        | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   kernel/sched/sched.h            |  1 +
>   4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index 5ddb8dc5ca91..48f3b6b20604 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -23,16 +23,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_flags);
>   
>   bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type)
>   {
> -	return !!(housekeeping_flags & BIT(type));
> +	return !!(READ_ONCE(housekeeping_flags) & BIT(type));
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_enabled);
>   
> +static bool housekeeping_dereference_check(enum hk_type type)
> +{
> +	if (type == HK_TYPE_DOMAIN) {
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && lockdep_is_cpus_write_held())
> +			return true;
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPUSETS) && lockdep_is_cpuset_held())
> +			return true;
> +
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}

Both lockdep_is_cpuset_held() and lockdep_is_cpus_write_held() may be 
defined only if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is set. However, this function is 
currently referenced by __housekeeping_cpumask() via RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(). 
So it is not invoked if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is not set. You are assuming that 
static function not referenced is not being compiled into the object 
file. Should we bracket it with "ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP" just to make this 
clear?


> +
> +static inline struct cpumask *__housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
> +{
> +	return rcu_dereference_check(housekeeping_cpumasks[type],
> +				     housekeeping_dereference_check(type));
> +}
> +
>   const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
>   {
> -	if (housekeeping_flags & BIT(type)) {
> -		return rcu_dereference_check(housekeeping_cpumasks[type], 1);
> -	}
> -	return cpu_possible_mask;
> +	const struct cpumask *mask = NULL;
> +
> +	if (READ_ONCE(housekeeping_flags) & BIT(type))
> +		mask = __housekeeping_cpumask(type);
> +	if (!mask)
> +		mask = cpu_possible_mask;
> +	return mask;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_cpumask);
>   
> @@ -70,12 +93,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_affine);
>   
>   bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_type type)
>   {
> -	if (housekeeping_flags & BIT(type))
> +	if (READ_ONCE(housekeeping_flags) & BIT(type))
>   		return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_cpumask(type));
>   	return true;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_test_cpu);
>   
> +int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *mask, enum hk_type type)
> +{
> +	struct cpumask *trial, *old = NULL;
> +
> +	if (type != HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)
> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> +	trial = kmalloc(sizeof(*trial), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!trial)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	cpumask_andnot(trial, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT), mask);
> +	if (!cpumask_intersects(trial, cpu_online_mask)) {
> +		kfree(trial);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (housekeeping_flags & BIT(type))
> +		old = __housekeeping_cpumask(type);
> +	else
> +		WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping_flags, housekeeping_flags | BIT(type));

Should we use to READ_ONCE() to retrieve the current housekeeping_flags 
value?

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-01  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-29 15:47 [PATCH 00/33 v2] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/33] sched/isolation: Remove housekeeping static key Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 21:34   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-18 12:04     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-01 10:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-18 13:18     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-11 20:57   ` Phil Auld
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/33] PCI: Protect against concurrent change of housekeeping cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]   ` <458c5db8-0c31-4c02-9c41-b7eca851d04a@redhat.com>
2025-09-18 14:00     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-22 21:51       ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23  9:07         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/33] cpu: Revert "cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug" Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/33] memcg: Prepare to protect against concurrent isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/33] mm: vmstat: " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/33] sched/isolation: Save boot defined domain flags Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-11 21:02   ` Phil Auld
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 07/33] cpuset: Convert boot_hk_cpus to use HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-11 21:03   ` Phil Auld
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 08/33] driver core: cpu: Convert /sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 09/33] net: Keep ignoring isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 10/33] block: Protect against concurrent " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 11/33] cpu: Provide lockdep check for CPU hotplug lock write-held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 12/33] cpuset: Provide lockdep check for cpuset lock held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 13/33] sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-01  0:40   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-09-22 14:57     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 15/33] sched/isolation: Flush memcg workqueues on cpuset isolated partition change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 16/33] sched/isolation: Flush vmstat " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 17/33] cpuset: Propagate cpuset isolation update to workqueue through housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-01  2:51   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-22 15:10     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 18/33] cpuset: Remove cpuset_cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 19/33] sched/isolation: Remove HK_TYPE_TICK test from cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 14:28   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-02 15:48     ` Waiman Long
2025-09-22 15:20       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-22 15:19     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-22 21:59       ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23  9:11         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 20/33] PCI: Remove superfluous HK_TYPE_WQ check Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 21/33] kthread: Refine naming of affinity related fields Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 22/33] kthread: Include unbound kthreads in the managed affinity list Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 23/33] kthread: Include kthreadd to " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 24/33] kthread: Rely on HK_TYPE_DOMAIN for preferred affinity management Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 25/33] sched: Switch the fallback task allowed cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 26/33] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 15:44   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23  9:17     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-23  9:24       ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 27/33] sched/arm64: Move fallback task cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 16:43   ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23  9:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 28/33] kthread: Honour kthreads preferred affinity after cpuset changes Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 29/33] kthread: Comment on the purpose and placement of kthread_affine_node() call Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 30/33] kthread: Add API to update preferred affinity on kthread runtime Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 31/33] kthread: Document kthread_affine_preferred() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 32/33] genirq: Correctly handle preferred kthreads affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 33/33] doc: Add housekeeping documentation Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 19:12 ` [PATCH 00/33 v2] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Waiman Long
2025-09-23  9:48   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-12-24 13:44 [PATCH 00/33 v5] " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-12-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2025-12-26  2:24   ` Waiman Long
2025-12-26  3:20     ` Waiman Long
2025-12-26  8:08   ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-31 14:21     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-01 22:13 [PATCH 00/33 v6] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-01 22:13 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-22 11:24   ` Chen Ridong
2026-01-25 22:45 [PATCH 00/33 v7] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-25 22:45 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a8cdeb85-2629-440d-9c11-69f6e19f8cb6@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®