From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Marco Crivellari" <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 20:40:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8cdeb85-2629-440d-9c11-69f6e19f8cb6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829154814.47015-15-frederic@kernel.org>
On 8/29/25 11:47 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Until now, HK_TYPE_DOMAIN used to only include boot defined isolated
> CPUs passed through isolcpus= boot option. Users interested in also
> knowing the runtime defined isolated CPUs through cpuset must use
> different APIs: cpuset_cpu_is_isolated(), cpu_is_isolated(), etc...
>
> There are many drawbacks to that approach:
>
> 1) Most interested subsystems want to know about all isolated CPUs, not
> just those defined on boot time.
>
> 2) cpuset_cpu_is_isolated() / cpu_is_isolated() are not synchronized with
> concurrent cpuset changes.
>
> 3) Further cpuset modifications are not propagated to subsystems
>
> Solve 1) and 2) and centralize all isolated CPUs within the
> HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask.
>
> Subsystems can rely on RCU to synchronize against concurrent changes.
>
> The propagation mentioned in 3) will be handled in further patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched/isolation.h | 4 +-
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +
> kernel/sched/isolation.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index 5ddb8dc5ca91..48f3b6b20604 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -23,16 +23,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_flags);
>
> bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type)
> {
> - return !!(housekeeping_flags & BIT(type));
> + return !!(READ_ONCE(housekeeping_flags) & BIT(type));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_enabled);
>
> +static bool housekeeping_dereference_check(enum hk_type type)
> +{
> + if (type == HK_TYPE_DOMAIN) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && lockdep_is_cpus_write_held())
> + return true;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPUSETS) && lockdep_is_cpuset_held())
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
Both lockdep_is_cpuset_held() and lockdep_is_cpus_write_held() may be
defined only if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is set. However, this function is
currently referenced by __housekeeping_cpumask() via RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN().
So it is not invoked if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is not set. You are assuming that
static function not referenced is not being compiled into the object
file. Should we bracket it with "ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP" just to make this
clear?
> +
> +static inline struct cpumask *__housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
> +{
> + return rcu_dereference_check(housekeeping_cpumasks[type],
> + housekeeping_dereference_check(type));
> +}
> +
> const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
> {
> - if (housekeeping_flags & BIT(type)) {
> - return rcu_dereference_check(housekeeping_cpumasks[type], 1);
> - }
> - return cpu_possible_mask;
> + const struct cpumask *mask = NULL;
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(housekeeping_flags) & BIT(type))
> + mask = __housekeeping_cpumask(type);
> + if (!mask)
> + mask = cpu_possible_mask;
> + return mask;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_cpumask);
>
> @@ -70,12 +93,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_affine);
>
> bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_type type)
> {
> - if (housekeeping_flags & BIT(type))
> + if (READ_ONCE(housekeeping_flags) & BIT(type))
> return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_cpumask(type));
> return true;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_test_cpu);
>
> +int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *mask, enum hk_type type)
> +{
> + struct cpumask *trial, *old = NULL;
> +
> + if (type != HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + trial = kmalloc(sizeof(*trial), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!trial)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cpumask_andnot(trial, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT), mask);
> + if (!cpumask_intersects(trial, cpu_online_mask)) {
> + kfree(trial);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (housekeeping_flags & BIT(type))
> + old = __housekeeping_cpumask(type);
> + else
> + WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping_flags, housekeeping_flags | BIT(type));
Should we use to READ_ONCE() to retrieve the current housekeeping_flags
value?
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 15:47 [PATCH 00/33 v2] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/33] sched/isolation: Remove housekeeping static key Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 21:34 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-18 12:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-01 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-18 13:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-11 20:57 ` Phil Auld
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/33] PCI: Protect against concurrent change of housekeeping cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <458c5db8-0c31-4c02-9c41-b7eca851d04a@redhat.com>
2025-09-18 14:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-22 21:51 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23 9:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/33] cpu: Revert "cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug" Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/33] memcg: Prepare to protect against concurrent isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/33] mm: vmstat: " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/33] sched/isolation: Save boot defined domain flags Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-11 21:02 ` Phil Auld
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 07/33] cpuset: Convert boot_hk_cpus to use HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-11 21:03 ` Phil Auld
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 08/33] driver core: cpu: Convert /sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 09/33] net: Keep ignoring isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 10/33] block: Protect against concurrent " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 11/33] cpu: Provide lockdep check for CPU hotplug lock write-held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 12/33] cpuset: Provide lockdep check for cpuset lock held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 13/33] sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-01 0:40 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-09-22 14:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 15/33] sched/isolation: Flush memcg workqueues on cpuset isolated partition change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 16/33] sched/isolation: Flush vmstat " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 17/33] cpuset: Propagate cpuset isolation update to workqueue through housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-01 2:51 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-22 15:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 18/33] cpuset: Remove cpuset_cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 19/33] sched/isolation: Remove HK_TYPE_TICK test from cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 14:28 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-02 15:48 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-22 15:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-22 15:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-22 21:59 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23 9:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 20/33] PCI: Remove superfluous HK_TYPE_WQ check Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 21/33] kthread: Refine naming of affinity related fields Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 22/33] kthread: Include unbound kthreads in the managed affinity list Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 23/33] kthread: Include kthreadd to " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 24/33] kthread: Rely on HK_TYPE_DOMAIN for preferred affinity management Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 25/33] sched: Switch the fallback task allowed cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 26/33] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 15:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23 9:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-23 9:24 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 27/33] sched/arm64: Move fallback task cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 16:43 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-23 9:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 28/33] kthread: Honour kthreads preferred affinity after cpuset changes Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 29/33] kthread: Comment on the purpose and placement of kthread_affine_node() call Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 30/33] kthread: Add API to update preferred affinity on kthread runtime Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 31/33] kthread: Document kthread_affine_preferred() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 32/33] genirq: Correctly handle preferred kthreads affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 33/33] doc: Add housekeeping documentation Frederic Weisbecker
2025-09-02 19:12 ` [PATCH 00/33 v2] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Waiman Long
2025-09-23 9:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-12-24 13:44 [PATCH 00/33 v5] " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-12-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2025-12-26 2:24 ` Waiman Long
2025-12-26 3:20 ` Waiman Long
2025-12-26 8:08 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-31 14:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-01 22:13 [PATCH 00/33 v6] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-01 22:13 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-22 11:24 ` Chen Ridong
2026-01-25 22:45 [PATCH 00/33 v7] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-25 22:45 ` [PATCH 14/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8cdeb85-2629-440d-9c11-69f6e19f8cb6@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®