From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Boris Belyavtsev <bbelyavtsev@usergate.com>, hare@suse.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lvc-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 v2 0/3] aic79xx: Add some non-NULL checks
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:07:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9c3ed6d6fac804a2f146288039228a9745d70bb.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9HZOMWGZGA4.2IADJWTQC9M6W@usergate.com>
On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 11:32 +0700, Boris Belyavtsev wrote:
> On Mon Apr 21, 2025 at 7:12 PM +07, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-04-21 at 15:16 +0700, Boris Belyavtsev wrote:
> > > Add non-NULL checks for ahd_lookup_scb return value.
> > >
> > > scb could be NULL if faulty hardware return certain incorrect
> > > values to the driver.
> >
> > It's a general principle that we trust values coming from the card
> > ... you are, after all, trusting it with your data. If there's a
> > fault in the way the card is operating, we can work around that, so
> > if you have a card which is producing these NULLs, can you provide
> > details so we can investigate?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > James
>
> Well, to be honest, I do not have such a device/card which would
> represent the problem. These checks are more about defensive
> programming (in case of an accident fault in a card for example).
We don't program defensively against adapters: they're part of our
trust domain. We only program defensively against input from untrusted
domains (like user space). The problem with defensively programming
drivers was nicely demonstrated by the driver hardening project:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230119170633.40944-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com/
In that there are so many ways that drivers could be used to attack the
OS, defending against all of them would dramatically impact the fast
path. Which is also the reason we don't imagine card faults and then
program for them without first finding the problem in the field.
Regards,
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-28 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-21 8:16 Boris Belyavtsev
2025-04-21 8:16 ` [PATCH 6.1 v2 1/3] scsi: aic79xx: check for non-NULL scb in ahd_handle_seqint Boris Belyavtsev
2025-04-21 8:16 ` [PATCH 6.1 v2 2/3] scsi: aic79xx: check for non-NULL scb in ahd_handle_pkt_busfree Boris Belyavtsev
2025-04-21 8:16 ` [PATCH 6.1 v2 3/3] scsi: aic79xx: check for non-NULL scb in ahd_linux_queue_abort_cmd Boris Belyavtsev
2025-04-21 12:12 ` [PATCH 6.1 v2 0/3] aic79xx: Add some non-NULL checks James Bottomley
2025-04-28 4:32 ` Boris Belyavtsev
2025-04-28 12:07 ` James Bottomley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9c3ed6d6fac804a2f146288039228a9745d70bb.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bbelyavtsev@usergate.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®