Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] x86: Make 5-level paging support unconditional for x86-64

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Both Intel and AMD CPUs support 5-level paging, which is expected to
> become more widely adopted in the future.
> 
> Remove CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL.
> 
> In preparation to that remove CONFIG_DYNAMIC_MEMORY_LAYOUT and make
> SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP the only memory model.
> 
> v3:
>  - Drop few "#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS >= 5";
>  - Make PARAVIRT_XXL 64-bit explicitly and drop ifdefs
>    to support PGTABLE_LEVELS < 5;
>  - Add Reviewed-by tags from Ard;
> v2:
>  - Fix 32-bit build by wrapping p4d_set_huge() and p4d_clear_huge() in
>    #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4;
>  - Rebased onto current tip/master;

Wow, -v1 was sent almost a year ago. :-)

> Kirill A. Shutemov (4):
>   x86/64/mm: Always use dynamic memory layout
>   x86/64/mm: Make SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP the only memory model
>   x86/64/mm: Make 5-level paging support unconditional
>   x86/paravirt: Restrict PARAVIRT_XXL to 64-bit only

>  24 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

Okay, this series makes a lot of sense, because in practice all major 
distros have 5-level paging enabled:

  .config.opensuse.default:     CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y
  .config.ubuntu.localinstall:  CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y
  .config.fedora.generic:       CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y
  .config.rhel.generic:         CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y

So the !CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL case gets very little runtime testing by 
distributions and users.

So I've applied the first two patches to tip:x86/core:

  x86/mm/64: Always use dynamic memory layout
  x86/mm/64: Make SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP the only memory model

as they are fairly straightforward.

Patch #3:

  x86/64/mm: Make 5-level paging support unconditional

... might have to wait until after v6.16-rc1, as it's a higher risk 
patch.

  x86/paravirt: Restrict PARAVIRT_XXL to 64-bit only

... and this one depends on patch #3.

Does this approach sound good to everyone?

Thanks,

	Ingo