From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Jake Hillion <jake@hillion.co.uk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
void@manifault.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, changwoo@igalia.com, hodgesd@meta.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] sched_ext: Guarantee rq lock on scx_bpf_cpu_rq()
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:31:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJtCSjsCEtN1csjg@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y23etey3foin5nrxgj6e4g373b3ap6oxqa5rrvuvwyus3umw5s@bgh3d6uuga5t>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 03:35:05PM +0100, Jake Hillion wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > Yeah, this is not nice, but they would be still broken though, in PATCH 1/3
> > we force schedulers to check for NULL and, if they don't, the verifier
> > won't be happy, so this already breaks existing binaries.
>
> I ran some testing on the sched_ext for-next branch, and scx_cosmos is
> breaking in cosmos_init including the latest changes. I believe it kicks
> off a timer in init, which indirectly calls
> `scx_bpf_cpu_rq(cpu)->curr->flags & PF_IDLE`. This should be NULL
> checked, but old binaries breaking is pretty inconvenient for new users.
>
> As Andrea says, this is the already merged patch triggering this.
We should provide a compat helper in common.bpf.h and fix the schedulers to
use this helper. Something like the following (untested):
static inline struct task_struct *
__COMPAT_scx_bpf_task_acquire_remote_curr(s32 cpu)
{
struct rq *rq;
if (bpf_ksym_exists(scx_bpf_task_acquire_remote_curr)
return scx_bpf_task_acquire_remote_curr(cpu);
rq = scx_bpf_cpu_rq(cpu);
return rq ? rq->curr : NULL;
}
Then we can drop this after a couple of kernel releases (like in v6.20).
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 11:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-08-05 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched_ext: Mark scx_bpf_cpu_rq as NULL returnable Christian Loehle
2025-08-05 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched_ext: Provide scx_bpf_task_acquire_remote_curr() Christian Loehle
2025-08-09 19:01 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-11 17:08 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-05 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched_ext: Guarantee rq lock on scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-08-09 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-10 10:52 ` Andrea Righi
2025-08-10 22:18 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-11 16:52 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-11 14:35 ` Jake Hillion
2025-08-11 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-12 13:31 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-08-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJtCSjsCEtN1csjg@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=hodgesd@meta.com \
--cc=jake@hillion.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®