From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/20] KVM: VMX: Set FRED MSR intercepts
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:17:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aK4yXT9y5YHeEWkb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c45a7c91-e393-4f71-8b22-aef6486aaa9e@zytor.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025, Xin Li wrote:
>
> > > Hi Sean,
> > >
> > > I'd like to bring up an issue concerning MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP.
> > >
> > > The FRED spec claims:
> > >
> > > The FRED SSP MSRs are supported by any processor that enumerates
> > > CPUID.(EAX=7,ECX=1):EAX.FRED[bit 17] as 1. If such a processor does not
> > > support CET, FRED transitions will not use the MSRs (because shadow stacks
> > > are not enabled), but the MSRs would still be accessible using MSR-access
> > > instructions (e.g., RDMSR, WRMSR).
> > >
> > > It means KVM needs to handle MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP even when FRED is supported
> > > but CET is not. And this can be broken down into two subtasks:
> > >
> > > 1) Allow such a guest to access MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP w/o triggering #GP. And
> > > this behavior is already implemented in patch 8 of this series.
> > >
> > > 2) Save and restore MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP in both KVM and Qemu for such a guest.
> >
> > What novel work needs to be done in KVM? For QEMU, I assume it's just adding an
> > "or FRED" somewhere. For KVM, I'm missing what additional work would be required
> > that wouldn't be naturally covered by patch 8 (assuming patch 8 is bug-free).
>
> Extra patches:
>
> 1) A patch to save/restore guest MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP (i.e., FRED SSP0), as
> what we have done for RSP0, following is the patch on top of the patch
> saving/restoring RSP0:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 449a5e02c7de..0bf684342a71 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1294,8 +1294,13 @@ void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> wrmsrq(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, vmx->msr_guest_kernel_gs_base);
>
> - if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED))
> + if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED)) {
> wrmsrns(MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0, vmx->msr_guest_fred_rsp0);
> +
> + /* XSAVES/XRSTORS do not cover SSP MSRs */
Eww. I'm with Andrew, fix the SDM. This is silly.
> + if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> + wrmsrns(MSR_IA32_FRED_SSP0, vmx->msr_guest_fred_ssp0);
FWIW, if we can't get an SDM change, don't bother with RDMSR/WRMSRNS, just
configure KVM to intercept accesses. Then in kvm_set_msr_common(), pivot on
X86_FEATURE_SHSTK, e.g.
case MSR_IA32_U_CET:
case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(msr != MSR_IA32_FRED_SSP0);
vcpu->arch.fred_rsp0_fallback = data;
break;
}
kvm_set_xstate_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
break;
and
case MSR_IA32_U_CET:
case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(msr_info->index != MSR_IA32_FRED_SSP0);
vcpu->arch.fred_rsp0_fallback = msr_info->data;
break;
}
kvm_get_xstate_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 22:36 [PATCH v6 00/20] Enable FRED with KVM VMX Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] KVM: VMX: Add support for the secondary VM exit controls Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] KVM: VMX: Initialize VM entry/exit FRED controls in vmcs_config Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] KVM: VMX: Disable FRED if FRED consistency checks fail Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] x86/cea: Export an API to get per CPU exception stacks for KVM to use Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-27 17:33 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-27 22:18 ` Xin Li
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] KVM: VMX: Initialize VMCS FRED fields Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] KVM: VMX: Set FRED MSR intercepts Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-25 2:51 ` Xin Li
2025-08-26 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-26 21:59 ` Xin Li
2025-08-26 22:17 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-08-27 22:24 ` Xin Li
2025-08-27 22:43 ` Xin Li
2025-08-28 23:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-26 18:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-08-26 22:03 ` Xin Li
2025-08-26 22:20 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] KVM: VMX: Save/restore guest FRED RSP0 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] KVM: VMX: Add support for FRED context save/restore Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] KVM: x86: Add a helper to detect if FRED is enabled for a vCPU Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] KVM: VMX: Virtualize FRED event_data Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] KVM: VMX: Virtualize FRED nested exception tracking Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] KVM: x86: Save/restore the nested flag of an exception Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] KVM: x86: Mark CR4.FRED as not reserved Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] KVM: VMX: Dump FRED context in dump_vmcs() Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] KVM: x86: Advertise support for FRED Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] KVM: nVMX: Add support for the secondary VM exit controls Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] KVM: nVMX: Add FRED VMCS fields to nested VMX context handling Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] KVM: nVMX: Add FRED-related VMCS field checks Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] KVM: nVMX: Add prerequisites to SHADOW_FIELD_R[OW] macros Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] KVM: nVMX: Allow VMX FRED controls Xin Li (Intel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aK4yXT9y5YHeEWkb@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®