From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.18] sched_ext: Acquire task reference in scx_bpf_cpu_curr()
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:01:16 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMCHjFwwjqvKsZBg@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909195709.92669-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hello, Andrea.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 09:57:09PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> scx_bpf_cpu_curr() has been introduced to retrieve the current task of a
> given runqueue, allowing schedulers to interact with that task.
>
> The kfunc assumes that it is always called in an RCU context, but this
> is not always guaranteed and some BPF schedulers can trigger the
> following warning:
>
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> sched_ext: BPF scheduler "cosmos_1.0.2_gd0e71ca_x86_64_unknown_linux_gnu_debug" enabled
> 6.17.0-rc1 #1-NixOS Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> kernel/sched/ext.c:6415 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> The correct behavior is to acquire a reference to the returned task, so
> the scheduler can safely access it and then release it with
> bpf_task_release().
>
> Update the kfunc and the corresponding compatibility helper to implement
> reference acquisition and prevent potential RCU warnings.
I think KF_RCU likely fits better for peeking kernel data structures than
having to acquire/release them. Can you post the full backtrace? Is it being
called from a sleepable bpf prog? Or is it that we just need to expand the
rcu check scope to cover regular rcu, bh and sched? And, everything aside,
if KF_RCU, should we be tripping on rcu_dereference() in the first place?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 19:57 Andrea Righi
2025-09-09 20:01 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2025-09-09 20:45 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-18 15:48 ` Christian Loehle
2025-09-18 16:06 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-18 16:46 ` Christian Loehle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMCHjFwwjqvKsZBg@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®