From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: allow scx_bpf_task_cgroup() in ops.dispatch()
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:32:06 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMnJRn8qdiFaqQXU@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915065236.13669-1-changwoo@igalia.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 03:52:36PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
...
> Fix this by adding the prev task to scx.kf_tasks so that task-related
> BPF helpers such as scx_bpf_task_cgroup() can be called safely. Since
> the SCX_CALL_OP_TASK family assumes the first argument is the task,
> introduce a new SCX_CALL_OP_TASK_ANY macro without that restriction.
> Also update __SCX_KF_TERMINAL to include SCX_KF_DISPATCH.
I'm not sure this is safe tho. ops.dispatch() can release the rq lock it's
holding to migrate tasks across rq's, which means that other operations can
nest inside - ie. there can be an irq which triggers ops.enqueue() while
ops.dispatch() is in progress. That can in turn overwrite
current->scx.kf_tasks[].
I wonder whether a better approach would be tracking cgroup membership from
BPF side. ops.init_task() tells you the initial cgroup it's joining and if
the task later moves to another cgroup, ops.cgroup_move() will be invoked.
Would that work?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 6:52 Changwoo Min
2025-09-16 20:32 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2025-09-17 2:12 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-17 5:00 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-20 2:15 ` Changwoo Min
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMnJRn8qdiFaqQXU@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®