From: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: allow scx_bpf_task_cgroup() in ops.dispatch()
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 11:15:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <edd77a64-6f7b-45cd-b2e9-36b67a7ca44e@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMpAaLZ_UF6qwTGM@slm.duckdns.org>
Hello,
Thanks for the clarification.
On 9/17/25 14:00, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 11:12:18AM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
>>> I'm not sure this is safe tho. ops.dispatch() can release the rq lock it's
>>> holding to migrate tasks across rq's, which means that other operations can
>>> nest inside - ie. there can be an irq which triggers ops.enqueue() while
>>> ops.dispatch() is in progress. That can in turn overwrite
>>> current->scx.kf_tasks[].
>>
>> I thought that ops.dispatch() always holds an rq lock since there
>> is a lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq) check at the beginning of
>> balance_one(), which invokes the BPF scheduler's dispatch.
>> I guess I am missing an edge case?
>
> ops.dispatch() is always called and returns with rq locked; however, it
> sometimes needs to migrate tasks across rq boundaries and thus can
> temporarily release the rq lock it was called with. Please take a look at
> dispatch_to_local_dsq() which is called from balance_one() ->
> flush_dispatch_buf() -> finish_dispatch().
You are right. I overlooked that path.
>>> I wonder whether a better approach would be tracking cgroup membership from
>>> BPF side. ops.init_task() tells you the initial cgroup it's joining and if
>>
>> Currently, it is also not allowed to call scx_bpf_task_cgroup()
>> at ops.init_task() because the rq lock is not held at
>> ops.init_task(). The earliest possible moment to get a task's
>> cgroup ID is ops.enable().
>
> ops.init_task() is called with scx_init_task_args, which contains .cgroup
> which points to the CPU controller cgroup the task belongs to.
Yeah, that's better than relying on ops.enable().
Regards,
Changwoo Min
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-20 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 6:52 Changwoo Min
2025-09-16 20:32 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-17 2:12 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-17 5:00 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-20 2:15 ` Changwoo Min [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=edd77a64-6f7b-45cd-b2e9-36b67a7ca44e@igalia.com \
--to=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®