From: Jonathan Santos <jonath4nns@gmail.com>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Santos <Jonathan.Santos@analog.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, lars@metafoo.de, jic23@kernel.org,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ad7768-1: prevent one-shot mode with wideband filter
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 19:41:14 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYEoCscolCfvasJ9@JSANTO12-L01.ad.analog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4eacb9b5e846b74df5ebb02f1c77135fb1b2fa0f.camel@gmail.com>
On 02/04, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Sat, 2026-01-31 at 22:35 -0300, Jonathan Santos wrote:
> > The AD7768-1 datasheet specifies that the wideband low ripple FIR filter
> > is only available in continuous conversion mode and should not be used
> > with one-shot mode to avoid malfunction and incorrect data.
> >
> > Add filter type checks in ad7768_scan_direct() to skip one-shot mode
> > switching when wideband filter is configured.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Santos <Jonathan.Santos@analog.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c
> > index 8d39b71703ae..374614ea97ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c
> > @@ -463,14 +463,17 @@ static int ad7768_scan_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > struct ad7768_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > int readval, ret;
> >
> > - ret = ad7768_set_mode(st, AD7768_ONE_SHOT);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > + /* Wideband filter is not available in One-Shot conversion mode */
> > + if (st->filter_type != AD7768_FILTER_WIDEBAND) {
> > + ret = ad7768_set_mode(st, AD7768_ONE_SHOT);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > - /* One-shot mode requires a SYNC pulse to generate a new sample */
> > - ret = ad7768_send_sync_pulse(st);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + /* One-shot mode requires a SYNC pulse to generate a new sample */
> > + ret = ad7768_send_sync_pulse(st);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > reinit_completion(&st->completion);
> >
> > @@ -496,9 +499,11 @@ static int ad7768_scan_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > * Any SPI configuration of the AD7768-1 can only be
> > * performed in continuous conversion mode.
> > */
> > - ret = ad7768_set_mode(st, AD7768_CONTINUOUS);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > + if (st->filter_type != AD7768_FILTER_WIDEBAND) {
> > + ret = ad7768_set_mode(st, AD7768_CONTINUOUS);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
>
> So the idea is to still have continuous mode running and get the latest sample after
> we do reinit_completion()? If that's the case, why do we have the one shot logic? Does
> it bring that much added value? Asking because I'm just wondering we could just let
> it in continuous mode all the time.
The concern on having continuous conversion mode all the time was that
sometimes, especially at higher sampling rates, a new conversion (DRDY)
occurs while the controller is still reading the ADC_DATA register.
I was initially worried the data register might be refreshed mid-transfer.
However, after reviewing the datasheet more carefully, that does not
appear to be the case. As the ADAQ7768-1 datasheet on page 76 states:
"The register driving DOUT resets by the last SCLK rising edge in
an SPI read frame, or a rising CS edge, whichever occurs first.
-> The number of SCLKs required to reset the SPI interface
depends on the read configuration. The 16th rising SCLK edge
resets the SPI interface for a normal read operation and up to
40 SCLKs when reading back ADC conversion data, plus the
status and CRC headers."
Then I guess we could just remove the one-shot mode.
>
> This also sounds like a fix so maybe a Fixes tag?
>
> - Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-01 1:35 [PATCH 0/3] iio: adc: ad7768-1: add support for SPI offload Jonathan Santos
2026-02-01 1:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ad7768-1: fix one-shot mode data acquisition Jonathan Santos
2026-02-07 16:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-09 21:38 ` Jonathan Santos
2026-02-14 14:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-01 1:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ad7768-1: prevent one-shot mode with wideband filter Jonathan Santos
2026-02-04 16:11 ` Nuno Sá
2026-02-02 22:41 ` Jonathan Santos [this message]
2026-02-01 1:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: ad7768-1: add support for SPI offload Jonathan Santos
2026-02-04 14:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-04 15:38 ` David Lechner
2026-02-05 5:42 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-05 6:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-02-05 6:44 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYEoCscolCfvasJ9@JSANTO12-L01.ad.analog.com \
--to=jonath4nns@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Santos@analog.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®