From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
To: luka.gejak@linux.dev, Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] wifi: rtw88: fw: send rate adaptation and RSSI info in the vendor layout
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:46:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa006f43-bb28-4067-8538-a63529ab546b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724181858.192903-6-luka.gejak@linux.dev>
On 24/07/2026 21:18, luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote:
> From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>
> The v41 firmware shipped with the RTL8723BS parses the vendor v5.2.17
> MACID_CFG and RA_INFO byte layouts rather than the bit packed rtw88
> ones, so the existing commands are misinterpreted and rate adaptation
> never settles.
>
> Emit the byte layout the firmware expects for this chip. The no_update
> bit needs care: setting it tells the firmware to keep the rate mask it
> already has, so a changed mask sent with no_update set is silently
> dropped. Track the last mask sent and clear no_update whenever it
> actually changes, while leaving it set for identical refreshes so the
> firmware keeps the rate it has learned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> index a81ff15218e1..495d26eafdd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> @@ -744,9 +744,19 @@ void rtw_fw_send_rssi_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_sta_info *si)
>
> SET_H2C_CMD_ID_CLASS(h2c_pkt, H2C_CMD_RSSI_MONITOR);
>
> - SET_RSSI_INFO_MACID(h2c_pkt, si->mac_id);
> - SET_RSSI_INFO_RSSI(h2c_pkt, rssi);
> - SET_RSSI_INFO_STBC(h2c_pkt, stbc_en);
> + if (rtw_is_8723bs(rtwdev)) {
> + /* Vendor v5.2.17 RA_INFO byte layout (H2C 0x42):
> + * [1] mac_id, [2] 0x00, [3] rssi, [4] stbc?0x04:0x00.
> + */
> + h2c_pkt[1] = si->mac_id & 0x7f;
> + h2c_pkt[2] = 0x00;
> + h2c_pkt[3] = rssi;
> + h2c_pkt[4] = stbc_en ? 0x04 : 0x00;
Not sure where you found the value 0x04. I see in hal/phydm/phydm_rssi_monitor.c
that it's setting bit 1, same as rtw88. The other bytes you set here
are equivalent to the macros in the else branch.
> + } else {
> + SET_RSSI_INFO_MACID(h2c_pkt, si->mac_id);
> + SET_RSSI_INFO_RSSI(h2c_pkt, rssi);
> + SET_RSSI_INFO_STBC(h2c_pkt, stbc_en);
> + }
>
> rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(rtwdev, h2c_pkt);
> }
> @@ -760,6 +770,37 @@ void rtw_fw_send_ra_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_sta_info *si,
>
> SET_H2C_CMD_ID_CLASS(h2c_pkt, H2C_CMD_RA_INFO);
>
> + if (rtw_is_8723bs(rtwdev)) {
> + /* The v41 firmware parses the vendor v5.2.17 MACID_CFG (0x40)
> + * byte layout, not the bit-packed rtw88 RA_INFO below:
> + * [1] mac_id, [2] rate_id | sgi_en(bit7),
> + * [3] bw(bits 1-0) | no_update(bit3), [4..7] 4-byte mask.
> + *
> + * no_update(bit3)=1 tells the firmware to keep its existing
> + * rate mask, so a mask that changes under no_update is dropped.
> + * Force no_update=0 whenever the mask actually changes so the
> + * update is applied, and keep no_update=1 for identical
> + * refreshes so the firmware retains the rate it has learned.
> + */
> + bool apply = reset_ra_mask || si->ra_mask != si->ra_mask_last;
This doesn't look like the vendor driver's behaviour. To me it
looks like rtw88 is already handling the no_update bit correctly.
> +
> + h2c_pkt[1] = si->mac_id & 0x7f;
> + h2c_pkt[2] = (si->rate_id & 0x1f) |
> + (si->sgi_enable ? BIT(7) : 0);
> + h2c_pkt[3] = ((si->bw_mode ? 3 : 1) & 0x3) |
> + (apply ? 0 : BIT(3));
> + h2c_pkt[4] = si->ra_mask & 0xff;
> + h2c_pkt[5] = (si->ra_mask >> 8) & 0xff;
> + h2c_pkt[6] = (si->ra_mask >> 16) & 0xff;
> + h2c_pkt[7] = (si->ra_mask >> 24) & 0xff;
> +
> + si->ra_mask_last = si->ra_mask;
> + si->init_ra_lv = 0;
> +
> + rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(rtwdev, h2c_pkt);
> + return;
> + }
> +
I bet you don't need to modify rtw_fw_send_ra_info() at all.
> SET_RA_INFO_MACID(h2c_pkt, si->mac_id);
> SET_RA_INFO_RATE_ID(h2c_pkt, si->rate_id);
> SET_RA_INFO_INIT_RA_LVL(h2c_pkt, si->init_ra_lv);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h
> index 8f86f7c12de5..9c435c160b61 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h
> @@ -782,6 +782,8 @@ struct rtw_sta_info {
> bool vht_enable;
> u8 init_ra_lv;
> u64 ra_mask;
> + /* Last rate mask sent to the firmware, to gate no_update. */
> + u64 ra_mask_last;
>
> DECLARE_BITMAP(tid_ba, IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 18:18 [PATCH 00/19] wifi: rtw88: preparations for RTL8723B/RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 01/19] wifi: rtw88: add the RTL8723B chip type and SDIO helper luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 02/19] wifi: rtw88: rx: mark zero length packets on RTL8723B luka.gejak
2026-07-24 22:34 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 03/19] wifi: rtw88: tx: extend the TX report purge timeout to RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 04/19] wifi: rtw88: fw: handle the RTL8723BS management TX reports luka.gejak
2026-07-24 22:53 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 05/19] wifi: rtw88: fw: send rate adaptation and RSSI info in the vendor layout luka.gejak
2026-07-24 23:46 ` Bitterblue Smith [this message]
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 06/19] wifi: rtw88: fw: send the media status report " luka.gejak
2026-07-24 23:52 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 07/19] wifi: rtw88: fw: add the vendor firmware commands used by RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-25 10:17 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 08/19] wifi: rtw88: fw: fix the reserved page upload on RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 09/19] wifi: rtw88: coex: add the RTL8723BS scan antenna workaround luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:32 ` [PATCH 10/19] wifi: rtw88: coex: reassert the antenna path when associating luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:32 ` [PATCH 11/19] wifi: rtw88: sdio: track free TX pages and OQT credits for RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:32 ` [PATCH 12/19] wifi: rtw88: sdio: handle the RTL8723BS management TX path luka.gejak
2026-07-25 11:08 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:32 ` [PATCH 13/19] wifi: rtw88: sdio: set up RX aggregation and interrupts for RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-25 11:25 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-26 1:35 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-26 6:17 ` Luka Gejak
2026-07-27 2:31 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:32 ` [PATCH 14/19] wifi: rtw88: sdio: add TX back-pressure and retry on page starvation luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:32 ` [PATCH 15/19] wifi: rtw88: record beacons from the target BSSID before authenticating luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:32 ` [PATCH 16/19] wifi: rtw88: run the RTL8723BS association register sequence luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:33 ` [PATCH 17/19] wifi: rtw88: calibrate and tune the PHY for RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-24 21:05 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:33 ` [PATCH 18/19] wifi: rtw88: match the RTL8723BS firmware connect and power save behaviour luka.gejak
2026-07-24 22:10 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
2026-07-24 18:33 ` [PATCH 19/19] wifi: rtw88: advertise the correct receive capabilities on RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-07-30 6:08 ` luka.gejak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa006f43-bb28-4067-8538-a63529ab546b@gmail.com \
--to=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome