From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] nvmem: split struct nvmem_device into refcounted and provider-owned data
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:44:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abkwm6ygIEp8PeYN@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223-nvmem-unbind-v2-6-0df33a933dca@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 11:57:07AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Data owned by the nvmem provider must not be part of the
> reference-counted struct nvmem_device.
It can be as long as it's not referenced after deregistration so this
claim is too strong.
It can be handled the way you are doing it here, but you could also just
use a boolean flag to indicate that no further callbacks should be made.
> Ahead of protecting that data
> with SRCU, move it into a separate structure the address of which is
> stored in nvmem_device.
> +/*
> + * Holds data owned by the provider of the nvmem implementation. This goes
> + * away immediately the moment nvmem_unregister() is called.
> + */
> +struct nvmem_impl {
> + nvmem_reg_read_t reg_read;
> + nvmem_reg_write_t reg_write;
> + void *priv;
And priv is just a pointer that is never used by nvmem core directly.
> +};
How about just wrapping the callbacks and calling the struct nvmem_ops
to make it more clear how this is used?
That is, that nvmem core guarantees that there will be no further
callbacks after deregistration.
> struct nvmem_device {
> struct module *owner;
> struct device dev;
> + struct nvmem_impl *impl;
> int stride;
> int word_size;
> int id;
> @@ -26,11 +37,8 @@ struct nvmem_device {
> struct nvmem_cell_info *cell);
> const struct nvmem_keepout *keepout;
> unsigned int nkeepout;
> - nvmem_reg_read_t reg_read;
> - nvmem_reg_write_t reg_write;
> struct gpio_desc *wp_gpio;
> struct nvmem_layout *layout;
> - void *priv;
> bool sysfs_cells_populated;
> };
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 10:57 [PATCH v2 0/7] nvmem: survive unbind with active consumers Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] nvmem: remove unused field from struct nvmem_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 16:00 ` Johan Hovold
2026-02-23 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] nvmem: return -EOPNOTSUPP to in-kernel users on missing callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 16:21 ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-29 15:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] nvmem: check the return value of gpiod_set_value_cansleep() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 16:28 ` Johan Hovold
2026-02-23 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] nvmem: simplify locking with guard() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 16:35 ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-29 15:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] nvmem: remove unneeded __nvmem_device_put() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 16:44 ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-29 15:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-23 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] nvmem: split struct nvmem_device into refcounted and provider-owned data Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-17 10:44 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2026-03-17 12:52 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 16:45 ` Johan Hovold
2026-02-23 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] nvmem: synchronize nvmem device unregistering with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-17 11:31 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abkwm6ygIEp8PeYN@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srini@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®