* [PATCH][next] media: i2c: fix error check on max9286_read call
@ 2020-07-20 16:13 Colin King
2020-07-20 19:04 ` Kieran Bingham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-07-20 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jacopo Mondi, Kieran Bingham, Laurent Pinchart,
Niklas Söderlund, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Currently the error return from the call to max9286_read is masked
with 0xf0 so the following check for a negative error return is
never true. Fix this by checking for an error first, then masking
the return value for subsequent conflink_mask checking.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
fixes: 66d8c9d2422d ("media: i2c: Add MAX9286 driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
index 47f280518fdb..b364a3f60486 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
@@ -405,10 +405,11 @@ static int max9286_check_config_link(struct max9286_priv *priv,
* to 5 milliseconds.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
- ret = max9286_read(priv, 0x49) & 0xf0;
+ ret = max9286_read(priv, 0x49);
if (ret < 0)
return -EIO;
+ ret &= 0xf0;
if (ret == conflink_mask)
break;
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][next] media: i2c: fix error check on max9286_read call
2020-07-20 16:13 [PATCH][next] media: i2c: fix error check on max9286_read call Colin King
@ 2020-07-20 19:04 ` Kieran Bingham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kieran Bingham @ 2020-07-20 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King, Jacopo Mondi, Laurent Pinchart,
Niklas Söderlund, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
Hi Colin,
On 20/07/2020 17:13, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently the error return from the call to max9286_read is masked
> with 0xf0 so the following check for a negative error return is
> never true. Fix this by checking for an error first, then masking
> the return value for subsequent conflink_mask checking.
Ooops!
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> fixes: 66d8c9d2422d ("media: i2c: Add MAX9286 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> index 47f280518fdb..b364a3f60486 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> @@ -405,10 +405,11 @@ static int max9286_check_config_link(struct max9286_priv *priv,
> * to 5 milliseconds.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> - ret = max9286_read(priv, 0x49) & 0xf0;
> + ret = max9286_read(priv, 0x49);
> if (ret < 0)
> return -EIO;
>
> + ret &= 0xf0;
> if (ret == conflink_mask)
> break;
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-20 19:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-20 16:13 [PATCH][next] media: i2c: fix error check on max9286_read call Colin King
2020-07-20 19:04 ` Kieran Bingham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®