mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/11] tuntap: accept an array of XDP buffs through sendmsg()
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:33:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac494845-1fcc-602b-dec9-c11109f55518@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906134834-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>



On 2018年09月07日 01:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch implement TUN_MSG_PTR msg_control type. This type allows
>> the caller to pass an array of XDP buffs to tuntap through ptr field
>> of the tun_msg_control. If an XDP program is attached, tuntap can run
>> XDP program directly. If not, tuntap will build skb and do a fast
>> receiving since part of the work has been done by vhost_net.
>>
>> This will avoid lots of indirect calls thus improves the icache
>> utilization and allows to do XDP batched flushing when doing XDP
>> redirection.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com>
> Is most of the benefit in batched flushing or skipping
> indirect calls? Because if it's flushing we can gain
> most of it easily by adding an analog of xmit_more.
>

Should be both. XDP_DROP doesn't flush but it gives obvious improvement.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06  4:05 [PATCH net-next 00/11] Vhost_net TX batching Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: sock: introduce SOCK_XDP Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:56   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:07     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] tuntap: switch to use XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:12     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] tuntap: enable bh early during processing XDP Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:02   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] tuntap: simplify error handling in tun_build_skb() Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:14   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:22     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-07 14:17       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-10  3:44         ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] tuntap: tweak on the path of non-xdp case " Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:16   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:24     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] tuntap: split out XDP logic Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:21   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:29     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-07 14:16       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-10  3:43         ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] tuntap: move XDP flushing out of tun_do_xdp() Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:48   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:31     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] tun: switch to new type of msg_control Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:54   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:35     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] tuntap: accept an array of XDP buffs through sendmsg() Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:51   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  7:33     ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] tap: " Jason Wang
2018-09-06 18:00   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:41     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] vhost_net: batch submitting XDP buffers to underlayer sockets Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:46   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  7:41     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-07 16:13       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-10  3:47         ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac494845-1fcc-602b-dec9-c11109f55518@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®