mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] tap: accept an array of XDP buffs through sendmsg()
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:41:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8542bbf-106f-2221-1e2d-34775bdea6f8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906135450-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>



On 2018年09月07日 02:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch implement TUN_MSG_PTR msg_control type. This type allows
>> the caller to pass an array of XDP buffs to tuntap through ptr field
>> of the tun_msg_control. Tap will build skb through those XDP buffers.
>>
>> This will avoid lots of indirect calls thus improves the icache
>> utilization and allows to do XDP batched flushing when doing XDP
>> redirection.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/tap.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
>> index 7996ed7cbf18..50eb7bf22225 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
>> @@ -1146,14 +1146,83 @@ static const struct file_operations tap_fops = {
>>   #endif
>>   };
>>   
>> +static int tap_get_user_xdp(struct tap_queue *q, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>> +{
>> +	struct virtio_net_hdr *gso = xdp->data_hard_start + sizeof(int);
>> +	int buflen = *(int *)xdp->data_hard_start;
>> +	int vnet_hdr_len = 0;
>> +	struct tap_dev *tap;
>> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
>> +	int err, depth;
>> +
>> +	if (q->flags & IFF_VNET_HDR)
>> +		vnet_hdr_len = READ_ONCE(q->vnet_hdr_sz);
>> +
>> +	skb = build_skb(xdp->data_hard_start, buflen);
>> +	if (!skb) {
>> +		err = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
> So fundamentally why is it called XDP?
> We just build and skb, don't we?

The reason is that the function accepts a pointer to XDP. And also the 
for the future development, I think the name is ok:

- we will probably do XDP offloading in this function.
- we may have a chance to call lower device's ndo_xdp_xmit() in the future.

Thanks

>
>> +
>> +	skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start);
>> +	skb_put(skb, xdp->data_end - xdp->data);
>> +
>> +	skb_set_network_header(skb, ETH_HLEN);
>> +	skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
>> +	skb->protocol = eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto;
>> +
>> +	if (vnet_hdr_len) {
>> +		err = virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, gso, tap_is_little_endian(q));
>> +		if (err)
>> +			goto err_kfree;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	skb_probe_transport_header(skb, ETH_HLEN);
>> +
>> +	/* Move network header to the right position for VLAN tagged packets */
>> +	if ((skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021Q) ||
>> +	     skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) &&
>> +	    __vlan_get_protocol(skb, skb->protocol, &depth) != 0)
>> +		skb_set_network_header(skb, depth);
>> +
>> +	rcu_read_lock();
>> +	tap = rcu_dereference(q->tap);
>> +	if (tap) {
>> +		skb->dev = tap->dev;
>> +		dev_queue_xmit(skb);
>> +	} else {
>> +		kfree_skb(skb);
>> +	}
>> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_kfree:
>> +	kfree_skb(skb);
>> +err:
>> +	rcu_read_lock();
>> +		tap = rcu_dereference(q->tap);
>> +	if (tap && tap->count_tx_dropped)
>> +		tap->count_tx_dropped(tap);
>> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>> +	return err;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int tap_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
>>   		       size_t total_len)
>>   {
>>   	struct tap_queue *q = container_of(sock, struct tap_queue, sock);
>>   	struct tun_msg_ctl *ctl = m->msg_control;
>> +	struct xdp_buff *xdp;
>> +	int i;
>>   
>> -	if (ctl && ctl->type != TUN_MSG_UBUF)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> +	if (ctl && ((ctl->type & 0xF) == TUN_MSG_PTR)) {
>> +		for (i = 0; i < ctl->type >> 16; i++) {
>> +			xdp = &((struct xdp_buff *)ctl->ptr)[i];
>> +			tap_get_user_xdp(q, xdp);
>> +		}
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	return tap_get_user(q, ctl ? ctl->ptr : NULL, &m->msg_iter,
>>   			    m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06  4:05 [PATCH net-next 00/11] Vhost_net TX batching Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: sock: introduce SOCK_XDP Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:56   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:07     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] tuntap: switch to use XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:12     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] tuntap: enable bh early during processing XDP Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:02   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] tuntap: simplify error handling in tun_build_skb() Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:14   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:22     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-07 14:17       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-10  3:44         ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] tuntap: tweak on the path of non-xdp case " Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:16   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:24     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] tuntap: split out XDP logic Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:21   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:29     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-07 14:16       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-10  3:43         ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] tuntap: move XDP flushing out of tun_do_xdp() Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:48   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:31     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] tun: switch to new type of msg_control Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:54   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:35     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] tuntap: accept an array of XDP buffs through sendmsg() Jason Wang
2018-09-06 17:51   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  7:33     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] tap: " Jason Wang
2018-09-06 18:00   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  3:41     ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-09-06  4:05 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] vhost_net: batch submitting XDP buffers to underlayer sockets Jason Wang
2018-09-06 16:46   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-07  7:41     ` Jason Wang
2018-09-07 16:13       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-10  3:47         ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8542bbf-106f-2221-1e2d-34775bdea6f8@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®