Re: [PATCH v3] media: qcom: iris: guard IRQ handler with runtime PM check

[Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@kernel.org>]

On 04/06/2026 10:07, Denny Lin wrote:
>> Could you please put your series of individual patches but group them
>> into a consistent list - so that I/we don't have to figure our how to
>> apply them and in which order.
> Sure. If patches are related or have an intended application order,
> I'll group them into a patch series in future submissions to make that
> clearer.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hungyu

Its just a bit confusing what you are doing here v1, v2, v3 in quick 
succession over a few topics in the same driver.

This feels like an aggregate fixes series. If the patches are 
individually applicable - great that's exactly what we want but, 
separating a series of fixes into individual bits and sending them out 
in quick succession is a bit of a mess in patchwork.

So could you _please_ just aggregate your fixes into a series so that 
the ordering is implicit - if ordering matters and the history of the 
reworking is contained in the series overview.

ty

---
bod