Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable various configs for TI platforms

["Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>]

Thanks Nishanth

On 7/26/2023 7:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> on $subject: I think mentioning K3 will help narrow things down a bit.
>
> On 19:00-20230726, Udit Kumar wrote:
>> Enable TI ECAP, DP83869 driver, TI OMAP2, K3 remote proc
> I think you mean to state TI mailbox and not omap2 :)

Not really :)

This driver TI OMAP2, (CONFIG_OMAP2PLUS_MBOX) is used in

TI K3 platforms as well for communications with remote processors.

Rest comments will address in v3.


>
>> SND_SOC_J721E_EVM, MCAN, UFS and RTI driver to be built
>> as module.
>> These are needed on different TI platforms.
> Please elaborate the list of boards this benefits TI platforms are a
> big variant list. TI Platforms is too generic a term that scales
> architectures.. that is not the point you are trying to make.
>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
> If the various contributers are ok, just my 2 cents:
> Could you drop all other sign-offs other than yours? I understand the
> contributions from various members on the TI SDK tree, but I'vent seen
> them attempt to upstream and you took the effort in ensuring the new
> squashed patch contains all the relevant components.
>
> [..]