mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"Rich Felker" <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
	"Torvald Riegel" <triegel@redhat.com>,
	"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] futex: Move futex related mm_struct data into a struct
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:00:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad989e03-c6e4-491f-a362-2c7584530184@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316164951.073076616@kernel.org>

On 2026-03-16 13:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Having all these members in mm_struct along with the required #ifdeffery is
> annoying, does not allow efficient initializing of the data with
> memset() and makes extending it tedious.
> 
> Move it into a data structure and fix up all usage sites.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> ---
>   include/linux/futex_types.h |   22 +++++++
>   include/linux/mm_types.h    |   11 ---
>   kernel/futex/core.c         |  123 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>   3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/futex_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/futex_types.h
> @@ -31,4 +31,26 @@ struct futex_ctrl {
>   struct futex_ctrl { };
>   #endif /* !CONFIG_FUTEX */
>   
> +/**
> + * struct futex_mm_data - Futex related per MM data
> + * @phash_lock:		Mutex to protect the private hash operations
> + * @phash:		RCU managed pointer to the private hash
> + * @phash_new:		Pointer to a newly allocated private hash
> + * @phash_batches:	Batch state for RCU synchronization
> + * @phash_rcu:		RCU head for call_rcu()
> + * @phash_atomic:	Aggregate value for @phash_ref
> + * @phash_ref:		Per CPU reference counter for a private hash
> + */
> +struct futex_mm_data {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_PRIVATE_HASH
> +	struct mutex			phash_lock;
> +	struct futex_private_hash	__rcu *phash;
> +	struct futex_private_hash	*phash_new;
> +	unsigned long			phash_batches;
> +	struct rcu_head			phash_rcu;
> +	atomic_long_t			phash_atomic;
> +	unsigned int			__percpu *phash_ref;
> +#endif
> +};

In the previous patch you use the approach of declaring an empty
structure within the #else, and here the content of the struct is
conditional. Preferably pick one approach ?

Other than this minor nit:

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 17:12 [patch 0/8] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 17:12 ` [patch 1/8] futex: Move futex task related data into a struct Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 17:55   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-17  2:24   ` André Almeida
2026-03-17  9:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 17:13 ` [patch 2/8] futex: Move futex related mm_struct " Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 18:00   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2026-03-16 17:13 ` [patch 3/8] futex: Provide UABI defines for robust list entry modifiers Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 18:02   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-17  2:38   ` André Almeida
2026-03-17  9:53     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 17:13 ` [patch 4/8] futex: Add support for unlocking robust futexes Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 18:24   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-17 16:17   ` André Almeida
2026-03-17 20:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-17 22:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-18  8:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-18  8:06           ` Florian Weimer
2026-03-18 14:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-18 16:03             ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 17:13 ` [patch 5/8] futex: Add robust futex unlock IP range Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 18:36   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-17 19:19   ` André Almeida
2026-03-16 17:13 ` [patch 6/8] futex: Provide infrastructure to plug the non contended robust futex unlock race Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 18:35   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-16 20:29     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 20:52       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-16 17:13 ` [patch 7/8] x86/vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 17:13 ` [patch 8/8] x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 19:19   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-16 21:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 22:35       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-16 21:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-16 21:29     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-17  7:25   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-17  9:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-17 11:17       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-18 16:17         ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19  7:41           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-19  8:53             ` Florian Weimer
2026-03-19  9:04               ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-19  9:08               ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-19 23:31                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 10:36             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19 10:49               ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-19 10:55                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-17  8:28   ` Florian Weimer
2026-03-17  9:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-17 10:37       ` Florian Weimer
2026-03-17 22:32         ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-18 22:08           ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-18 22:10             ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-19  2:05             ` André Almeida
2026-03-19  7:10               ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-17 15:33   ` Uros Bizjak
2026-03-18  8:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-18  8:32       ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad989e03-c6e4-491f-a362-2c7584530184@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=dalias@aerifal.cx \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=triegel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®