From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, "Wang\,
Shane" <shane.wang@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Cihula\, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/txt for v2.6.32
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:44:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada4oqgp5qx.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091003203619.GA27182@khazad-dum.debian.net> (Henrique de Moraes Holschuh's message of "Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:36:20 -0300")
> > > So I modify the RAM content so that BIOS does not think measured
> > > environment existed before suspend?
> And it is ridiculously easy to pull off, too:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/21/cold-boot-disk-encryption-attack-is-shockingly-effective/
>
> Shows the attack being used to read sensitive keys, but you can use it also
> to *modify* system running state (it will be more difficult, as you need to
> remove and replace the RAM while on S3 instead of S5, but it should be
> doable by someone who knows what he is doing).
I believe the whole point of this TXT / S3 handling is that the resume
from S3 will then be able to detect that the contents of RAM have been
modified while the system was asleep.
TXT simply produces a reasonably trustworthy measurement of system
state. If you modify RAM while the system is asleep, then you will not
be able to produce a measurement showing an unmodified system state.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-03 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-14 20:51 H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-26 9:56 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-26 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-28 21:02 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-28 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-28 21:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-28 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-29 6:34 ` Shane Wang
2009-09-29 17:13 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-29 17:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 2:16 ` Wang, Shane
2009-09-30 6:54 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-02 17:02 ` Wang, Shane
2009-10-02 17:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-03 15:00 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-03 20:19 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-03 20:36 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-03 20:44 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2009-10-06 8:12 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-07 16:47 ` Cihula, Joseph
2009-10-17 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-03 21:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-03 21:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ada4oqgp5qx.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joseph.cihula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shane.wang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome