From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
To: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Karol Gugala <kgugala@antmicro.com>,
Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@antmicro.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Kamil Rakoczy <krakoczy@antmicro.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>, Longbin Li <looong.bin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: litex_mmc: Set mandatory idle clocks before CMD0
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:13:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae1ms3rVwOZhCVuC@inochi.infowork> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeuIVeIGV2Wc9sY2@errol.ini.cmu.edu>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 11:12:21AM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 09:36:14AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > The litex_mmc driver assumes the card is already probed in the BIOS
> > and skip the phy initialization. This will cause the command fail
> > like the following when the old card is unplugged and then insert
> > a new card:
> >
> > [ 62.923593] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 8) error, status -110
> > [ 62.949717] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
> > [ 62.976606] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
> > [ 63.002516] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
> > [ 63.028442] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
> >
> > Add required clock settings and initialization for the CMD 0, so it can
> > probe the new card.
> >
> > Fixes: 92e099104729 ("mmc: Add driver for LiteX's LiteSDCard interface")
> > Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Change from v1:
> > - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20260421025052.755471-1-inochiama@gmail.com/
> > 1. use fsleep to replace udelay
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/litex_mmc.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/litex_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/litex_mmc.c
> > index d2f19c2dc673..ac0b47604c02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/litex_mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/litex_mmc.c
> > @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
> > #define SD_SLEEP_US 5
> > #define SD_TIMEOUT_US 20000
> >
> > +#define SD_INIT_DELAY_US 1000
> > +#define SD_INIT_CLK_HZ 400000
> > +
> > #define SDIRQ_CARD_DETECT 1
> > #define SDIRQ_SD_TO_MEM_DONE 2
> > #define SDIRQ_MEM_TO_SD_DONE 4
> > @@ -99,6 +102,8 @@ struct litex_mmc_host {
> > bool app_cmd;
> > };
> >
> > +static void litex_mmc_setclk(struct litex_mmc_host *host, unsigned int freq);
> > +
>
> Instead of the forward reference, can you simply move the entire
> `litex_mmc_setclk` function definition to this location in the file?
> (i.e., add a separate, "cosmetic" patch simply cut'n'pasting the
> function body from one place to another, with a commit blurb stating
> that it's in preparation for the idle-clock fix, and that it contains
> only cosmetic, no functional changes)?
>
> The idle-clock fix patch can then contain nothing but the
> "#define SD_INIT_*" lines and the hunk below:
>
Thanks, it is fine for me. I will send a new version for this.
Regards,
Inochi
> > static int litex_mmc_sdcard_wait_done(void __iomem *reg, struct device *dev)
> > {
> > u8 evt;
> > @@ -128,6 +133,12 @@ static int litex_mmc_send_cmd(struct litex_mmc_host *host,
> > int ret;
> > u8 evt;
> >
> > + if (cmd == MMC_GO_IDLE_STATE) {
> > + litex_mmc_setclk(host, SD_INIT_CLK_HZ);
> > + litex_write8(host->sdphy + LITEX_PHY_INITIALIZE, 1);
> > + fsleep(SD_INIT_DELAY_US);
> > + }
> > +
> > litex_write32(host->sdcore + LITEX_CORE_CMDARG, arg);
> > litex_write32(host->sdcore + LITEX_CORE_CMDCMD,
> > cmd << 8 | transfer << 5 | response_len);
>
> Thanks much,
> --Gabriel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-26 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 1:36 Inochi Amaoto
2026-04-24 15:12 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2026-04-26 1:13 ` Inochi Amaoto [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae1ms3rVwOZhCVuC@inochi.infowork \
--to=inochiama@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=gsomlo@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=kgugala@antmicro.com \
--cc=krakoczy@antmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=looong.bin@gmail.com \
--cc=mholenko@antmicro.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®