Re: [PATCH] i386: mark two more functions as __init

["Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>]

On 8/9/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> On Tue,  8 Aug 2006 17:17:00 +0900 (JST)
> Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > i386: mark two more functions as __init
> >
> > cyrix_identify() should be __init because transmeta_identify() is.
> > tsc_init() is only called from setup_arch() which is marked as __init.
> >
> > These two section mismatches have been detected using running modpost on
> > a vmlinux image compiled with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y.
> >
> > -static void cyrix_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c)
> > +static void __init cyrix_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c)
>
> Are we sure?  We end up putting a pointer to this into
> arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c:cpu_devs[], and that gets used from __cpuinit
> code.

Uh, right. The problem is that almost all cpu code is put in the
__init section today. I'll break out and resend the tsc code, and on
top of that post a set of patches that puts cpu code and data into
__cpuinit and __cpuinitdata sections.

Thanks!

/ magnus