Re: [PATCH v4] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unnecessary parentheses

[Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 12:51:12PM +0800, Eugene Mavick wrote:
> Remove unnecessary parentheses to clear checkpatch.pl warnings
> 
> Example of fixed warnings:
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around dvobj->cam_cache[id]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Mavick <m@mavick.dev>
> ---

When I'm reviewing patches one thing that I'm checking is that if
people deliberately tries to slip something unexpected into the patch.
I created a script to help me strip away many of the common staging
changes so I can focus on the interesting stuff.

https://github.com/error27/rename_rev

This is v4 of this patch and so at this point what I really want is for
my script to say there is nothing unexpected at all.  Almost everything
here is related to the checkpatch warning about &(foo->bar).  Some of
the other changes are good, but at this point, I just want to get
something we can apply.  Do the other changes in a different patch.

Here is the output from my script that I want removed.

`cat email.txt | rename_rev.pl -r amp`

>  	struct mlme_ext_priv *pmlmeext = &padapter->mlmeextpriv;
>  	struct mlme_ext_info *pmlmeinfo = &pmlmeext->mlmext_info;
>  
> -	if ((pmlmeinfo->HT_info_enable) && (pmlmeinfo->HT_caps_enable)) {
> +	if (pmlmeinfo->HT_info_enable && pmlmeinfo->HT_caps_enable) {

Good but do it in another patch.

>  		pmlmeinfo->HT_enable = 1;
>  	} else {
>  		pmlmeinfo->HT_enable = 0;
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@
>  
>  	case 2: /* auto */
>  	default:
> -		if ((pmlmeinfo->ERP_enable) && (pmlmeinfo->ERP_IE & BIT(1))) {
> +		if (pmlmeinfo->ERP_enable && (pmlmeinfo->ERP_IE & BIT(1))) {

Same.

>  			if (pregpriv->vcs_type == 1) {
>  				psta->rtsen = 1;
>  				psta->cts2self = 0;
> @@ -168,13 +168,13 @@
>  
>  	if (encryp_protocol == ENCRYP_PROTOCOL_WPA || encryp_protocol == ENCRYP_PROTOCOL_WPA2) {
>  		pbuf = rtw_get_wpa_ie(&bssid->ies[12], &wpa_ielen, bssid->ie_length - 12);
> -		if (pbuf && (wpa_ielen > 0)) {
> +		if (pbuf && wpa_ielen > 0) {

No.  Don't do this.

>  			rtw_parse_wpa_ie(pbuf, wpa_ielen + 2, &group_cipher,
>  					 &pairwise_cipher, &is_8021x);
>  		} else {
>  			pbuf = rtw_get_wpa2_ie(&bssid->ies[12], &wpa_ielen, bssid->ie_length - 12);
>  
> -			if (pbuf && (wpa_ielen > 0))
> +			if (pbuf && wpa_ielen > 0)

No.  Don't do this.

>  				rtw_parse_wpa2_ie(pbuf, wpa_ielen + 2, &group_cipher,
>  						  &pairwise_cipher, &is_8021x);
>  		}
> @@ -182,8 +182,11 @@
>  
>  	pmlmepriv->NumOfBcnInfoChkFail++;
>  
> -	if ((pmlmepriv->timeBcnInfoChkStart != 0) && (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - pmlmepriv->timeBcnInfoChkStart) <= DISCONNECT_BY_CHK_BCN_FAIL_OBSERV_PERIOD_IN_MS)
> -		&& (pmlmepriv->NumOfBcnInfoChkFail >= DISCONNECT_BY_CHK_BCN_FAIL_THRESHOLD)) {
> +	if ((pmlmepriv->timeBcnInfoChkStart != 0) &&
> +	    (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - pmlmepriv->timeBcnInfoChkStart) <=
> +			DISCONNECT_BY_CHK_BCN_FAIL_OBSERV_PERIOD_IN_MS) &&
> +				pmlmepriv->NumOfBcnInfoChkFail >=
> +					DISCONNECT_BY_CHK_BCN_FAIL_THRESHOLD) {

This seems unrelated to parentheses.  Do it another patch.

>  		pmlmepriv->timeBcnInfoChkStart = 0;
>  		pmlmepriv->NumOfBcnInfoChkFail = 0;
>  		return _FAIL;
> @@ -228,7 +231,7 @@
>  	struct wlan_bssid_ex *cur_network = &pmlmeinfo->network;
>  	unsigned char *rate = cur_network->supported_rates;
>  
> -	if ((pmlmeinfo->HT_info_enable) && (pmlmeinfo->HT_caps_enable))
> +	if (pmlmeinfo->HT_info_enable && pmlmeinfo->HT_caps_enable)

Good but do it in another patch.

>  		pmlmeinfo->HT_enable = 1;
>  
>  	if (pmlmeinfo->HT_enable)
> 
> done.

regards,
dan carpenter