mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@01019freenet.de>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Piszcz <ap@solarrain.com>,
	"users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" <users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: rt2800: fix zeroing skb structure
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:35:52 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1108031433570.9421@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110803183349.GA5956@redhat.com>



On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 01:44:10PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> Tested that patch:
>>
>> 1. The driver no longer automatically loads, I had to manually modprobe it.
> This must be some other problem not related with patch.
Yes, will check this again shortly.

>
>> 2. After loading, I get this (keep getting these)
>>
>> [  384.054538] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.072773] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.096545] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.117301] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.537586] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.555716] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.573903] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.599465] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
>> [  384.618523] phy0 -> rt2800_txdone: Error - Data pending
> You can remove line
>
> ERROR(rt2x00dev, "Data pending\n");
>
> from rt2800_txdone to stop seeing this. It's kinda interesting
> how frequent this happens.
It seems to happen somewhat often; e.g. if you apt-get install pkg, it
will popup 3-4 times.

>
>> No crash yet, but bad ping again too (always with the rt2800usb) driver:
>>
>> 64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=53.1 ms
>> 64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=285 ms
>> 64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=89.6 ms
>> 64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=120 ms
>> 64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=42.2 ms
>> 64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=156 ms
>> 64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=77.2 ms
>
> I think patch could have site effect to not run tx queue while we have pending
> data on it. Do you have such ping times always (i.e. after a 5 minutes, 10
> minutes, 20  ... ) or just randomly?

Randomly.

64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=203 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=27.6 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=159 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=80.3 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=194 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=114 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=34.0 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=162 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=83.1 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=214 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=11 ttl=64 time=134 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=12 ttl=64 time=149 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=13 ttl=64 time=70.3 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=14 ttl=64 time=201 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=15 ttl=64 time=122 ms
64 bytes from atomw.internal.lan (192.168.0.2): icmp_req=16 ttl=64 time=42.7 ms

34 packets transmitted, 34 received, 0% packet loss, time 33047ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.620/117.755/216.279/62.033 ms

Still working so far though, at least the box has not crashed yet, but I'll
give it some more time.

Justin.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-03 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-27 23:33 3.0: rt2800usb(Kernel PANIC) vs. rt2780sta(GOOD/2.6.38) Justin Piszcz
2011-07-28  5:34 ` Andreas Hartmann
2011-07-28 16:18 ` Larry Finger
2011-07-30 11:30   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-07-30 11:32     ` [PATCH] rt2x00: rt2800: fix zeroing skb structure Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-07-30 11:39       ` Justin Piszcz
2011-07-30 14:20         ` Justin Piszcz
2011-07-30 14:32           ` Justin Piszcz
2011-07-30 15:05             ` Andreas Hartmann
2011-07-30 17:07               ` Justin Piszcz
2011-07-30 17:10                 ` Justin Piszcz
2011-07-31  3:41                   ` Adam Cozzette
2011-07-31 10:09                     ` Justin Piszcz
2011-07-30 18:07                 ` Larry Finger
2011-08-03 16:00                 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-08-03 17:31                   ` Justin Piszcz
2011-08-03 17:44                     ` Justin Piszcz
2011-08-03 18:32                       ` Justin Piszcz
2011-08-03 18:33                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-08-03 18:35                         ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
2011-08-03 18:42                           ` Justin Piszcz
2011-08-03 18:49                             ` Justin Piszcz
2011-08-04  8:03                         ` Justin Piszcz
2011-08-04 12:43                           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-08-05 16:13                           ` [rt2x00-users] " Aleksandar Milivojevic
2011-07-30 13:41       ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2011-07-30 14:02       ` Ivo Van Doorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1108031433570.9421@p34.internal.lan \
    --to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=IvDoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=andihartmann@01019freenet.de \
    --cc=ap@solarrain.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®