mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
	<andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	<ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	<jeremy@goop.org>, <matt.fleming@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	<eshelton@pobox.com>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	<linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:30:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1406181523340.13771@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A1B726020000780001B6CF@mail.emea.novell.com>

On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.06.14 at 15:52, <matt@console-pimps.org> wrote:
> > EFI_PARAVIRT will be usable by architectures other than x86, correct? If
> > your intention is for it only ever to be used by x86, then it should
> > probably be EFI_ARCH_2.
> 
> I would expect ARM, once it gets UEFI support on the Xen side, to
> be able to handle most of this identically to x86. Which raises the
> question whether most of the new Xen-specific code (in one of the
> other patches) wouldn't better live under drivers/xen/.

I was thinking the same thing.

However this patch series doesn't add much code outside
drivers/xen/efi.c and include/xen/interface/platform.h.
I think it wouldn't be fair to ask Daniel to refactor the efi code
currently under arch/x86 to an arch-independent location.
Whoever comes in later and adds EFI Xen support for ARM can do that.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-18 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-13 17:00 [PATCH v5 0/7] xen: Add EFI support Daniel Kiper
2014-06-13 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] efi: Use early_mem*() instead of early_io*() Daniel Kiper
2014-06-16  1:19   ` Matthew Garrett
2014-06-18 12:17   ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-18 12:31     ` David Vrabel
2014-06-18 12:59     ` Daniel Kiper
2014-06-18 14:56       ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-18 13:59     ` Mark Salter
2014-06-13 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag Daniel Kiper
2014-06-16 10:52   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-06-18 13:52   ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-18 13:58     ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-18 14:30       ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2014-06-18 15:08         ` Daniel Kiper
2014-06-18 15:12         ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-18 16:48     ` Daniel Kiper
2014-06-19 14:41       ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-20 14:36         ` Daniel Kiper
2014-06-13 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] xen: Define EFI related stuff Daniel Kiper
2014-06-16 10:54   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-06-13 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] xen: Put EFI machinery in place Daniel Kiper
2014-06-16 11:55   ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-16 18:45     ` Daniel Kiper
2014-06-16 12:00   ` David Vrabel
2014-06-16 19:06     ` Daniel Kiper
2014-06-13 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arch/x86: Replace plain strings with constants Daniel Kiper
2014-06-18 13:56   ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-13 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] arch/x86: Remove redundant set_bit() call Daniel Kiper
2014-06-18 13:56   ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-18 14:01     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 14:09       ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-13 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] arch/x86: Comment out efi_set_rtc_mmss() Daniel Kiper
2014-06-16 11:43   ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-16 11:54     ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2014-06-16 18:59       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-18 14:08   ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] xen: Add EFI support Matt Fleming
2014-06-18 14:31   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 14:48     ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1406181523340.13771@kaball.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=eshelton@pobox.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®