mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be atomic flags
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:10:04 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1409231508590.22630@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54212509.1030809@huawei.com>

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014, Zefan Li wrote:

> When we change cpuset.memory_spread_{page,slab}, cpuset will flip
> PF_SPREAD_{PAGE,SLAB} bit of tsk->flags for each task in that cpuset.
> This should be done using atomic bitops, but currently we don't,
> which is broken.
> 
> Tetsuo reported a hard-to-reproduce kernel crash on RHEL6, which happend
> when one thread tried to clear PF_USED_MATH while at the same time another
> thread tried to flip PF_SPREAD_PAGE/PF_SPREAD_SLAB. They both operate on
> the same task.
> 
> Here's the full report:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/230
> 
> To fix this, we make PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPARED_SLAB atomic flags.
> 

s/SPARED/SPREAD/

> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Fixes: 950592f7b991 ("cpusets: update tasks' page/slab spread flags in time")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 2.6.31+
> Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpuset.h |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/sched.h  | 13 +++++++++++--
>  kernel/cpuset.c        |  9 +++++----
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> index 0d4e067..2f073db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ extern int cpuset_slab_spread_node(void);
>  
>  static inline int cpuset_do_page_mem_spread(void)
>  {
> -	return current->flags & PF_SPREAD_PAGE;
> +	return task_spread_page(current);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread(void)
>  {
> -	return current->flags & PF_SPREAD_SLAB;
> +	return task_spread_slab(current);
>  }
>  
>  extern int current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5630763..7b1cafe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1903,8 +1903,6 @@ extern void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut,
>  #define PF_KTHREAD	0x00200000	/* I am a kernel thread */
>  #define PF_RANDOMIZE	0x00400000	/* randomize virtual address space */
>  #define PF_SWAPWRITE	0x00800000	/* Allowed to write to swap */
> -#define PF_SPREAD_PAGE	0x01000000	/* Spread page cache over cpuset */
> -#define PF_SPREAD_SLAB	0x02000000	/* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
>  #define PF_NO_SETAFFINITY 0x04000000	/* Userland is not allowed to meddle with cpus_allowed */
>  #define PF_MCE_EARLY    0x08000000      /* Early kill for mce process policy */
>  #define PF_MUTEX_TESTER	0x20000000	/* Thread belongs to the rt mutex tester */
> @@ -1958,6 +1956,9 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
>  
>  /* Per-process atomic flags. */
>  #define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0	/* May not gain new privileges. */
> +#define PFA_SPREAD_PAGE  1      /* Spread page cache over cpuset */
> +#define PFA_SPREAD_SLAB  2      /* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
> +
>  
>  #define TASK_PFA_TEST(name, func)					\
>  	static inline bool task_##func(struct task_struct *p)		\
> @@ -1972,6 +1973,14 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
>  TASK_PFA_TEST(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
>  TASK_PFA_SET(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
>  
> +TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
> +TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
> +TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
> +
> +TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
> +TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
> +TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
> +
>  /*
>   * task->jobctl flags
>   */
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index a37f4ed..1f107c7 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -365,13 +365,14 @@ static void cpuset_update_task_spread_flag(struct cpuset *cs,
>  					struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
>  	if (is_spread_page(cs))
> -		tsk->flags |= PF_SPREAD_PAGE;
> +		task_set_spread_page(tsk);
>  	else
> -		tsk->flags &= ~PF_SPREAD_PAGE;
> +		task_clear_spread_page(tsk);
> +
>  	if (is_spread_slab(cs))
> -		tsk->flags |= PF_SPREAD_SLAB;
> +		task_set_spread_slab(tsk);
>  	else
> -		tsk->flags &= ~PF_SPREAD_SLAB;
> +		task_clear_spread_slab(tsk);
>  }
>  
>  /*

This most certainly needs commentary to specify why these have to be 
atomic ops.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-23 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-23  7:44 [PATCH v3 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Zefan Li
2014-09-23  7:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched: add macros to define bitops for task atomic flags Zefan Li
2014-09-23 10:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-23 16:58     ` Kees Cook
2014-09-23  7:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be " Zefan Li
2014-09-23 22:10   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2014-09-24  3:15     ` Zefan Li
2014-09-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Tejun Heo
2014-09-24 13:35   ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-24 14:09     ` Tetsuo Handa
2014-09-24 14:32       ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-25  1:42     ` Zefan Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1409231508590.22630@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®