mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] rtmutex: Do not boost fair tasks each other
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 22:26:56 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405282157100.3952@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399314660.6978.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 613 bytes --]

On Mon, 5 May 2014, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> В Сб, 03/05/2014 в 20:54 +0200, Thomas Gleixner пишет:
> > Though exercising that code path as much as we can is not a bad thing
> > either. So I'd like to see that made compile time conditional on one
> > of the lock testing CONFIG items.
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_BOOST_ALL

No, not another pointless config option. Read what I said. What's
wrong with using an existing config item, e.g DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES?

> +#define heritable_prio(prio)		(rt_prio(prio) || dl_prio(prio))

inheritable please. It's not priority heritance and never will be.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-28 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-01  9:21 Kirill Tkhai
2014-05-03 18:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-04  7:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-04 12:13     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-05 18:31   ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-05-28 20:26     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-05-29 20:52       ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-17 14:19         ` Kirill Tkhai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1405282157100.3952@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome