mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:29:21 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1408270020020.3323@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140826212934.GP4120@two.firstfloor.org>

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > So what's the point of making the obvious onliner patch
> > 
> > -	case 71:
> > 
> > into something which reorders the sorted case numbers?
>  
> This was a merging mistake. I'll fix it to be a one liner.
> 
> > And of course, this patch is missing any explanation WHY 71 is
> > incorrect and how it got there in the first place.
> 
> 71 is a Broadwell, as you would know if you had read the next patch.

And why on earth do I need to read the next patch to figure out what
the heck this patch is doing?

Just because it's written by someone who gives a shit?

Your unwillingness to cooperate and your advisory resistance are
slowly approaching the Krause level...

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-26 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25 22:43 Broadwell perf support Andi Kleen
2014-08-25 22:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
2014-08-26 21:27   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-08-26 21:29     ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-26 22:29       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-08-27  9:53         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-08-27 16:37           ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-27 18:50             ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-08-25 22:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models Andi Kleen
2014-09-01 13:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-25 22:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support Andi Kleen
2014-09-01 13:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-04 13:14     ` Stephane Eranian
2014-11-04 13:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-25 22:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
2014-09-01 13:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-25 22:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Use Broadwell cache event list for Haswell Andi Kleen
2014-09-01 13:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-02 18:44 [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
2014-09-18 22:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-27 21:03 perf, x86: Updated Broadwell patchkit Andi Kleen
2014-08-27 21:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  1:17 Updated Broadwell perf patchkit Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1408270020020.3323@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®