From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "pang.xunlei" <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] time: Add do_settimeofday64() safe version(using timespec64)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:24:41 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410301411290.5308@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414667745-7703-2-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, pang.xunlei wrote:
Your subject line
> time: Add do_settimeofday64() safe version(using timespec64)
is confusing at best.
time: Provide y2038 safe do_settimeofday() replacement
That explains what the patch is doing in a very precice way.
> /**
> - * do_settimeofday - Sets the time of day
> - * @tv: pointer to the timespec variable containing the new time
> + * do_settimeofday64 - Sets the time of day
> + * @ts: pointer to the timespec64 variable containing the new time
> *
> * Sets the time of day to the new time and update NTP and notify hrtimers
> + * Safe version for 2038 safety.
I rather put this into the function description above:
+ * do_settimeofday64 - Sets the time of day. 2038 safe.
Way simpler to grep for.
> */
> -int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
> +int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
> {
> struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
> - struct timespec64 ts_delta, xt, tmp;
> + struct timespec64 ts_delta, xt;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (!timespec_valid_strict(tv))
> + if (!timespec64_valid_strict(ts))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
> @@ -723,13 +724,12 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
> timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
>
> xt = tk_xtime(tk);
> - ts_delta.tv_sec = tv->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
> - ts_delta.tv_nsec = tv->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;
> + ts_delta.tv_sec = ts->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
> + ts_delta.tv_nsec = ts->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;
>
> tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, timespec64_sub(tk->wall_to_monotonic, ts_delta));
>
> - tmp = timespec_to_timespec64(*tv);
> - tk_set_xtime(tk, &tmp);
> + tk_set_xtime(tk, ts);
>
> timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
>
> @@ -741,6 +741,22 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday64);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL please.
> +
> +/**
> + * do_settimeofday - Sets the time of day
> + * @tv: pointer to the timespec variable containing the new time
> + *
> + * Sets the time of day to the new time and update NTP and notify hrtimers
> + * TODO: [2038 safety] should be replaced by do_settimeofday64().
The TODO is not to replace do_settimeofday() by do_settimeofday64(). The TODO
is to fix the call sites.
So instead of adding this you can simply say:
+ * do_settimeofday - Sets the time of day. Deprecated. Use do_settimeofday64()
We want things like this easy to find and not be burried in some
cryptic comment.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-30 11:15 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Convert do_settimeofday() to use timespec64 pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] time: Add do_settimeofday64() safe version(using timespec64) pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 13:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] time: Add mktime64() safe version(using time64_t) pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 13:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] time: Add rtc_tm_to_time64() " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 13:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 16:30 ` pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 20:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] time: Add rtc_time_to_tm64() " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] time: Convert all users of do_settimeofday() to use do_settimeofday64() pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 15:27 ` John Stultz
2014-10-30 16:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] time: Remove do_settimeofday() pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] time: Convert alarm_set_rtc() to use timespec64 pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] time: Convert xen_read_wallclock() " pang.xunlei
[not found] ` <54522159.8070204@citrix.com>
2014-10-30 14:58 ` [Xen-devel] " Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] time: Convert pvclock_read_wallclock() " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] time: Convert x86_platform.set_wallclock()to " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] time: Convert x86_platform.get_wallclock()to " pang.xunlei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1410301411290.5308@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®