mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "pang.xunlei" <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] time: Add rtc_tm_to_time64() safe version(using time64_t)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:55:13 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410301444100.5308@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414667745-7703-4-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org>

On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, pang.xunlei wrote:

Same $subject issue.

> As part of addressing 2038 saftey for in-kernel uses, this patch
> adds safe rtc_tm_to_time64() using time64_t. After this patch,
> rtc_tm_to_time() should be replaced by rtc_tm_to_time64() one by
> one. Eventually, rtc_tm_to_time() will be removed from the kernel
> when it has no users.
> 
> Signed-off-by: pang.xunlei <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c |   15 ++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/rtc.h   |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c
> index c4cf057..6948cbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c
> @@ -110,10 +110,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtc_valid_tm);
>  
>  /*
>   * Convert Gregorian date to seconds since 01-01-1970 00:00:00.
> + * Safe version for 2038 safety.

Docbook comment missing. See the previous replies.

> + */
> +int rtc_tm_to_time64(struct rtc_time *tm, time64_t *time)

What's the point of the return value? Just because rtc_tm_to_time()
has one? 

Yes it does, but that does not mean that we blindly copy the existing
nonsense when we implement a replacement interface.

What's wrong with changing it to:

time64_t rtc_tm_to_time64(struct rtc_time *tm)
{
	return mktime64(......);
}

> +/*
> + * Convert Gregorian date to seconds since 01-01-1970 00:00:00.
> + * TODO: [2038 safety] should be replaced by rtc_tm_to_time64.

Groan.

>   */
>  int rtc_tm_to_time(struct rtc_time *tm, unsigned long *time)
>  {
> -       *time = mktime(tm->tm_year + 1900, tm->tm_mon + 1, tm->tm_mday,
> +       *time = (unsigned long) mktime64(tm->tm_year + 1900, tm->tm_mon + 1, tm->tm_mday,
>                         tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);

And that would become

    	 *time = rtc_time_to_time64(tm);

>         return 0;
>  }

Please stop doing purely mechanical changes. Just blindly copying
stuff and make it take time64_t instead of unsigned long can be done
with a script as well.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-30 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-30 11:15 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Convert do_settimeofday() to use timespec64 pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] time: Add do_settimeofday64() safe version(using timespec64) pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 13:24   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] time: Add mktime64() safe version(using time64_t) pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 13:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] time: Add rtc_tm_to_time64() " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 13:55   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-10-30 16:30     ` pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 20:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] time: Add rtc_time_to_tm64() " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] time: Convert all users of do_settimeofday() to use do_settimeofday64() pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 15:27     ` John Stultz
2014-10-30 16:06       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] time: Remove do_settimeofday() pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] time: Convert alarm_set_rtc() to use timespec64 pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] time: Convert xen_read_wallclock() " pang.xunlei
     [not found]   ` <54522159.8070204@citrix.com>
2014-10-30 14:58     ` [Xen-devel] " Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] time: Convert pvclock_read_wallclock() " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 14:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] time: Convert x86_platform.set_wallclock()to " pang.xunlei
2014-10-30 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] time: Convert x86_platform.get_wallclock()to " pang.xunlei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1410301444100.5308@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®