From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] watchdog: Use a reference cycle counter to avoid scaling issues
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:01:04 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1504232153080.13914@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429801408-11309-1-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> The problem with using cycle counter for NMI watchdog is that its
> frequency changes with the corresponding core's frequency. This means
> that, in particular, if the core frequency scales up, watchdog NMI will
> arrive more frequently than what user requested through watchdog_thresh
> and also increasing the probability of setting off the hardlockup detector,
> because the corresponding hrtimer will keep firing at the same intervals
> regardless of the core frequency. And, if the core can turbo to up to 2.5x
> its base frequency (and therefore TSC) [1], we'll have the hrtimer and NMI
So you are saying that this M-5Y10 has a non-constant TSC again? You
really can't be serious about that.
Please provide the output of /proc/cpuinfo
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-23 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 15:03 Alexander Shishkin
2015-04-23 20:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-04-23 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2015-04-23 21:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-24 0:51 ` Andi Kleen
2015-04-24 8:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-24 9:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-24 9:46 ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-04-24 9:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-24 9:59 ` Andi Kleen
2015-04-24 11:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-24 9:01 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1504232153080.13914@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®