From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] irq updates for 4.3
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 18:05:28 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509011801570.15006@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55E48529.5070907@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 09:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> > <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Marc Zyngier (23):
> > > irqchip/GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1
> >
> > This appears to lead to qemu arm boot tests silently failing (according
> > to Guenter). This commit only appeared in next-20150831.
> >
>
> I think we really need more time between patches showing up in -next and
> being pushed upstream. We have several new failures in -next which were
> introduced after next-20150828, with this being the most serious one.
Sorry about that. I usally let stuff breed long enough in next, but I
made an exception on this one. I tested it on several ARM boards
myself and certainly did not expect that there are still non
devicetree (or ACPI) based systems utilizing the GIC out there. I
certainly did not think about qemu ...
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 10:04 Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-31 16:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-31 16:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 16:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-09-01 16:05 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-09-01 16:10 ` [GIT pull V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-07 10:04 [GIT pull] " Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-18 11:58 Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-11 8:13 Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1509011801570.15006@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®