From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix thermal throttling reporting after kexec
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:33:53 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510122233200.6097@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444681922-8644-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> The per CPU thermal vector init code checks if the thermal
> vector is already installed and complains and bails out if
> it is.
>
> This happens after kexec, as kernel shut down does
> not clear the thermal vector APIC register.
>
> This causes two problems:
>
> So we always do not fully initialize thermal reports
> after kexec. The CPU is still likely initialized,
> as the previous kernel should have done it. But
> we don't set up the software pointer to the thermal
> vector, so reporting may end up with a unknown thermal
> interrupt message.
>
> Also it complains for every logical CPU, even though the
> value is actually derived from BP only.
>
> The problem is that we end up with one message per CPU,
> so on larger systems it becomes very noisy and messes up
> the otherwise nicely formatted CPU bootup numbers in
> the kernel log.
>
> Just remove the check. I checked the code and there's
> no valid code paths where the thermal init code for a CPU
> could be called multiple times.
>
> Why the kernel does not clean up this value on shutdown:
>
> The thermal monitoring is controlled per logical CPU thread.
> Normal shutdown code is just running on one CPU.
> To disable it we would need a broadcast NMI to all CPUs
> on shut down. That's overkill for this. So we just
> ignore it after kexec.
>
> v2: Updated commit log to discuss why the value is not
> cleaned up on shutdown.
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 20:32 Andi Kleen
2015-10-12 20:33 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-10-13 10:43 ` Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-24 20:10 Andi Kleen
2015-10-01 12:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 17:27 ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-01 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 21:50 ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-01 22:04 ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-02 20:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-11 19:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1510122233200.6097@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®