Re: [PATCH RFC] timer: drop the unnecessary while loop in msleep

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:

>  The while loop in msleep does not seem necessary as
> timeout is unsigned long and no larger than MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET (which is
> LONG_MAX/2 - 1) so the while-loop condition is always true at the beginning
> (msecs_to_jiffies will return >=0 always and with the +1 timeout is >= 1 so
> the while condition is always true at the start) and
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible always returns 0, so the while loop always
> terminates after the first loop.

Err, no. schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() can return > 0 when there was a
non timer wakeup. Thinks spurious wakeups. So we need that loop.
 
> Q: what is the purpose of the + 1 offset to the jiffies here ?
> 
> msleep was introduced in 2.6.7 but without the + 1, so with:
> 	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(msecs);
> in 2.6.10-rc2 the msecs_to_jiffies(msecs) + 1; is introduced.
> Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/19/294)
> seems to be the origin while converting msleep to a macro, but no reason
> for the + 1 is given there.

Not really. The +1 was introduced with the following commit:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/kernel/timer.c?id=c259ef842622a5e64418d9dab3b62ee051867edf

Thanks,

	tglx