From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: vikas.shivappa@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
h.peter.anvin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86,perf/cqm: Fix cqm memory leak and notifier leak
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:22:39 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1603081012170.6083@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456962839-29170-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
Please fix the subject line prefix: "x86/perf/intel/cqm:"
> Fixes the hotcpu notifier leak and other global variable memory leaks
> during cqm(cache quality of service monitoring) initialization.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Fixed the memory leak for cqm_rmid_ptrs as per Thomas feedback.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
> index e6be335..37a93fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c
> @@ -250,10 +250,13 @@ static int intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache(void)
>
> return 0;
> fail:
> - while (r--)
> + while (r--) {
> kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[r]);
> + cqm_rmid_ptrs[r] = NULL;
> + }
>
> kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
> + cqm_rmid_ptrs = NULL;
This partial rollback is crap. Why can't you utilize cqm_cleanup() ?
Performance certainly is not an issue here.
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> @@ -1320,9 +1323,19 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_cqm_match[] = {
> {}
> };
>
> +static void cqm_cleanup(void)
> +{
> + int r = cqm_max_rmid;
> +
> + while (r--)
> + kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[r]);
> +
> + kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
> +}
> +
> static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
> {
> - char *str, scale[20];
> + char *str = NULL, scale[20];
> int i, cpu, ret;
>
> if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_cqm_match))
> @@ -1382,16 +1395,25 @@ static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
> cqm_pick_event_reader(i);
> }
>
> - __perf_cpu_notifier(intel_cqm_cpu_notifier);
> -
> ret = perf_pmu_register(&intel_cqm_pmu, "intel_cqm", -1);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> pr_err("Intel CQM perf registration failed: %d\n", ret);
> - else
> + goto out;
> + } else {
> pr_info("Intel CQM monitoring enabled\n");
> + }
>
> + /*
> + * Register the hot cpu notifier once we are sure cqm
> + * is enabled to avoid notifier leak.
> + */
> + __perf_cpu_notifier(intel_cqm_cpu_notifier);
> out:
> cpu_notifier_register_done();
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(str);
> + cqm_cleanup();
This is still broken. If intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache() fails, you clear
cqm_rmid_ptrs and then jump to out. ret is -ENOMEM, so you will call
cqm_cleanup which will dereference cqm_rmid_ptrs .....
Find below a delta patch, which fixes that proper and safe.
Thanks,
tglx
8<----------------
arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c
@@ -211,6 +211,20 @@ static void __put_rmid(u32 rmid)
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &cqm_rmid_limbo_lru);
}
+static void cqm_cleanup(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (!cqm_rmid_ptrs)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cqm_max_rmid; i++)
+ kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[i]);
+
+ kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
+ cqm_rmid_ptrs = NULL;
+}
+
static int intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache(void)
{
struct cqm_rmid_entry *entry;
@@ -218,7 +232,7 @@ static int intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache(vo
int r = 0;
nr_rmids = cqm_max_rmid + 1;
- cqm_rmid_ptrs = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cqm_rmid_entry *) *
+ cqm_rmid_ptrs = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cqm_rmid_entry *) *
nr_rmids, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cqm_rmid_ptrs)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -247,16 +261,10 @@ static int intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache(vo
mutex_lock(&cache_mutex);
intel_cqm_rotation_rmid = __get_rmid();
mutex_unlock(&cache_mutex);
-
return 0;
-fail:
- while (r--) {
- kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[r]);
- cqm_rmid_ptrs[r] = NULL;
- }
- kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
- cqm_rmid_ptrs = NULL;
+fail:
+ cqm_cleanup();
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -1313,16 +1321,6 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_cqm
{}
};
-static void cqm_cleanup(void)
-{
- int r = cqm_max_rmid;
-
- while (r--)
- kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[r]);
-
- kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
-}
-
static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
{
char *str = NULL, scale[20];
@@ -1389,10 +1387,10 @@ static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
if (ret) {
pr_err("Intel CQM perf registration failed: %d\n", ret);
goto out;
- } else {
- pr_info("Intel CQM monitoring enabled\n");
}
+ pr_info("Intel CQM monitoring enabled\n");
+
/*
* Register the hot cpu notifier once we are sure cqm
* is enabled to avoid notifier leak.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 23:48 [PATCH V5 0/6] Intel memory b/w monitoring support Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-01 23:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86,perf/cqm: Fix cqm handling of grouping events into a cache_group Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-07 23:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-10 0:18 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-01 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86,perf/cqm: Fix cqm memory leak and notifier leak Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-02 8:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-02 17:58 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-02 23:53 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-08 9:22 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-03-08 19:36 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-01 23:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/mbm: Intel Memory B/W Monitoring enumeration and init Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-02 8:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-02 17:59 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-02 21:31 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-02 23:56 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-03 7:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-03 18:26 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-03 18:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-08 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-08 19:36 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-01 23:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/mbm: Memory bandwidth monitoring event management Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-07 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-07 23:27 ` Luck, Tony
2016-03-08 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-10 22:46 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-10 22:49 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-01 23:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/mbm: RMID Recycling MBM changes Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-01 23:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/mbm: Add support for MBM counter overflow handling Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-02 23:58 ` Vikas Shivappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1603081012170.6083@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®