From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] perf/x86/intel/pt: IP filtering register/cpuid bits
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:55:38 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1604212051020.3941@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160421174813.GA29639@pd.tnic>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A 0x00000580
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_B 0x00000581
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR1_A 0x00000582
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR1_B 0x00000583
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR2_A 0x00000584
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR2_B 0x00000585
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_A 0x00000586
> > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_B 0x00000587
>
> So can we not turn msr-index.h a dumping ground for MSRs pls?
>
> If those are only PT-relevant, why not define them all in pt.h?
I have to disagree here. The MSRs itself can really go into msr-index.h while
the bit definitions might go elsewhere. What's wrong with having all MSRs at a
central place?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 15:16 [PATCH v1 0/5] perf: Introduce address range filtering Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-21 15:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] perf: Move set_filter() from behind EVENT_TRACING Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-21 15:17 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] perf/x86/intel/pt: IP filtering register/cpuid bits Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-21 17:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-04-21 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-21 20:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 20:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-22 7:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-04-22 9:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 15:17 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] perf: Extend perf_event_aux_ctx() to optionally iterate through more events Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-21 15:17 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] perf: Introduce address range filtering Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-22 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 16:19 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-25 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 15:41 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-25 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:02 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-25 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:03 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-25 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:07 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-25 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:14 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-26 14:35 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-21 15:17 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add support for address range filtering in PT Alexander Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1604212051020.3941@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®