From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"josh@joshtriplett.org" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"jiangshanlai@gmail.com" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] debugobjects: insulate non-fixup logic related to static obj from fixup callbacks
Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 18:09:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1605081808020.3540@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A05D2DCE6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Sun, 8 May 2016, Du, Changbin wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de]
> > > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags);
> > > /*
> > > - * Maybe the object is static. Let the type specific
> > > + * Maybe the object is static. Let the type specific
> > > * code decide what to do.
> >
> > Instead of doing white space changes you really want to explain the logic
> > here.
> >
> Comments is in following code.
Well. It's a comment, but the code you replace has better explanations about
statically initialized objects. This should move here.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-08 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-06 23:09 changbin.du
2016-05-07 0:16 ` kbuild test robot
2016-05-07 8:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-05-07 12:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-08 7:44 ` Du, Changbin
2016-05-08 16:09 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-05-09 3:02 ` Du, Changbin
2016-05-09 7:03 ` [PATCH v2] " changbin.du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1605081808020.3540@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®