From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Grzegorz Andrejczuk <grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, bp@suse.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, lukasz.daniluk@intel.com,
james.h.cownie@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com,
Piotr.Luc@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Enabling Ring 3 MONITOR/MWAIT feature for Knights Landing
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:31:56 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611091518210.3501@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478699194-30946-1-git-send-email-grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com>
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016, Grzegorz Andrejczuk wrote:
> These patches enable Intel Xeon Phi x200 feature to use MONITOR/MWAIT
> instruction in ring 3 (userspace) Patches set MSR 0x140 for all logical CPUs.
> Then expose it as CPU feature and introduces elf HWCAP capability for x86.
> Reference:
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2016/10/06/intel-xeon-phi-product-family-x200-knl-user-mode-ring-3-monitor-and-mwait
>
> v9:
> Removed PHI from defines
Do I really have to spell out everything? I asked you several times to get
rid of all PHI associations except for the feature detection logic.
But no, you still insist on it being a PHI special feature and once it
becomes available on other models, which can be expected, we can deal with
the cleanup and a PHI specific kernel parameter which we have to support
forever.
I'm slowly starting to get really grumpy. Your attitude of just addressing
review comments in the most minimal way w/o thinking about the big picture
is annoying.
This is hillarious. 9 versions of that simple thing, just because you
insist on slapping PHI to everything despite being told otherwise.
I do not care about the time you waste with this, but I very much care
about the time you steal from me.
If you can't be bothered to send something which addresses _ALL_ my review
comments, then so be it. The next version is the last one I'm going to look
at.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-09 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-09 13:46 Grzegorz Andrejczuk
2016-11-09 13:46 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] x86/msr: add MSR_MISC_FEATURE_ENABLES and RING3MWAIT bit Grzegorz Andrejczuk
2016-11-09 13:46 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] x86/elf: use HWCAP2 to expose ring 3 MWAIT Grzegorz Andrejczuk
2016-11-09 13:46 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] x86/cpufeature: add RING3MWAIT to CPU features Grzegorz Andrejczuk
2016-11-09 13:46 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] x86/cpufeatures: handle RING3MWAIT on Xeon Phi models Grzegorz Andrejczuk
2016-11-09 14:31 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-11-09 21:48 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] Enabling Ring 3 MONITOR/MWAIT feature for Knights Landing Andrejczuk, Grzegorz
2016-11-09 22:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1611091518210.3501@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=Piotr.Luc@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=james.h.cownie@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.daniluk@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®