From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kernel: sched: Provide a pointer to the valid CPU mask
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:56:12 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704061354440.1716@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406115058.pntrn7mgywt7j3va@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:03:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > Fair enough, but I prefer to have the ability for a temporary restriction
> > of the user space visible cpus allowed mask in the core code, which can be
> > used for both migrate_disable() and things like that MIPS FPU stuff rather
> > than all those home brewn hackeries which are prone to bitrot, security
> > issues and subtle wreckage. cpus_allowed should be solely under sched core
> > control and not accessible from anything outside.
>
> So the big difference between what MIPS does and what migrate_disable()
> needs here is the amount of storage.
>
> For migrate_disable() we don't need a whole second cpumask bitmap. We
> can simply use one of the static cpumask_of() things.
>
> Given that cpumask bitmaps can be quite large, adding another one to
> task_struct just for $very_rare_occasion, doesn't seem like a good
> thing.
A pointer to the effective mask is definitely enough. And that's what we
need for migrate_disable() as well. That still leaves the storage
requirement to MIPS.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-06 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 18:42 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-04-05 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-05 8:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-04-06 6:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-06 7:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-04-06 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-06 9:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-04-06 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 10:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-06 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-06 11:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-06 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-07 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-06 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 9:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-04-06 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 10:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-06 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 11:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-06 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 11:56 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-04-06 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-11 1:38 ` [lkp-robot] [kernel] c1f943ee40: kernel_BUG_at_kernel/smpboot.c kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1704061354440.1716@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®