From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] irq updates for 4.13
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:52:17 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707111249340.1799@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707111148240.1799@nanos>
Sebastian,
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> So this crashes in do_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore() !?! I just have to
> wonder how the raw_spin_lock() succeeded. That does not make any sense.
can you please apply the patch below on top of 4.12? It's a backport
isolating the resource request changes.
Thanks,
tglx
8<----------------------
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1198,6 +1198,18 @@ static int
if (desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)
new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
+ mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
+ if (!desc->action) {
+ ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
+ new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
+ goto out_mutex;
+ }
+ }
+
+ chip_bus_lock(desc);
+
/*
* The following block of code has to be executed atomically
*/
@@ -1298,13 +1310,6 @@ static int
}
if (!shared) {
- ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
- new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
- goto out_mask;
- }
-
init_waitqueue_head(&desc->wait_for_threads);
/* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */
@@ -1312,10 +1317,8 @@ static int
ret = __irq_set_trigger(desc,
new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK);
- if (ret) {
- irq_release_resources(desc);
+ if (ret)
goto out_mask;
- }
}
desc->istate &= ~(IRQS_AUTODETECT | IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED | \
@@ -1373,6 +1376,8 @@ static int
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+ mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
/*
* Strictly no need to wake it up, but hung_task complains
@@ -1402,6 +1407,13 @@ static int
out_mask:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+ if (!desc->action)
+ irq_release_resources(desc);
+
+out_mutex:
+ mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
+
free_cpumask_var(mask);
out_thread:
@@ -1443,9 +1455,7 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval)
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1469,6 +1479,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsi
if (!desc)
return NULL;
+ mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
chip_bus_lock(desc);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
@@ -1501,7 +1512,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsi
if (!desc->action) {
irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc);
irq_shutdown(desc);
- irq_release_resources(desc);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1543,6 +1553,11 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsi
}
}
+ if (!desc->action)
+ irq_release_resources(desc);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
+
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
module_put(desc->owner);
kfree(action->secondary);
@@ -1699,9 +1714,7 @@ int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int ir
return retval;
}
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, action);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval) {
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1949,9 +1962,7 @@ int setup_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, s
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval)
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -2005,9 +2016,7 @@ int request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq,
return retval;
}
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, action);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval) {
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
--- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
/*
* Core internal functions to deal with irq descriptors
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ struct pt_regs;
* IRQF_FORCE_RESUME set
* @rcu: rcu head for delayed free
* @kobj: kobject used to represent this struct in sysfs
+ * @request_mutex: mutex to protect request/free before locking desc->lock
* @dir: /proc/irq/ procfs entry
* @name: flow handler name for /proc/interrupts output
*/
@@ -92,6 +94,7 @@ struct irq_desc {
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct kobject kobj;
#endif
+ struct mutex request_mutex;
int parent_irq;
struct module *owner;
const char *name;
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ static struct irq_desc *alloc_desc(int i
raw_spin_lock_init(&desc->lock);
lockdep_set_class(&desc->lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
+ mutex_init(&desc->request_mutex);
init_rcu_head(&desc->rcu);
desc_set_defaults(irq, desc, node, affinity, owner);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-09 8:49 Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-10 13:35 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-10 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-10 19:38 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-10 20:15 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-10 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-11 6:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 9:26 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-11 9:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 10:52 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-07-11 11:21 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-11 13:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 13:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-11 14:39 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-11 9:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 13:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-11 14:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 15:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 15:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-11 15:39 ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-07-11 16:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-12 8:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-07-11 15:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-11 16:14 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-11 16:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-11 17:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 17:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-11 16:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-11 17:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-11 21:30 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-11 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-11 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-11 22:51 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-12 5:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-15 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-17 6:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-17 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-17 21:33 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-11 16:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-11 14:41 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-07-11 16:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-07-11 16:34 ` Sebastian Reichel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-03 7:42 Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-04 8:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-07-04 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-04 19:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 20:48 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-07-06 13:58 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-07-04 21:56 ` Jens Axboe
2017-07-05 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1707111249340.1799@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®