From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
Srishti Sharma <srishtishar@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8188eu: core: Use list_for_each_entry_safe
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:41:50 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710041641280.2815@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004144012.jciztelhwjdyzpwg@mwanda>
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 03:39:30PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 01:58:32AM +0530, Srishti Sharma wrote:
> > > > Use list_for_each_entry_safe when the list elements may get deleted
> > > > during traversal.
> > >
> > > This patch is fine as a cleanup but none of these are actually buggy.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you are getting at with the comment. The commit doesn't
> > say that they were buggy. Perhaps the commit message could have been more
> > verbose, like "Use list operators on list_head values.
> > List_for_each_entry_safe is needed because the list elements get deleted
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> It is not *needed*, the original code works fine. The problem with the
> original code, is that it's ugly as sin.
>
> > during the traversal"?
>
> The changelog needs to say *why* we're applying the patch. At first I
> thought it was going to fix a use after free. What I would prefer in
> the changelog is something like: "This patch is a cleanup and doesn't
> change runtime behavior. It changes an open coded list traversal to
> use list_for_each_entry_safe."
OK, Srishti, you can put that. But change the subject lines too.
julia
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20171004144012.jciztelhwjdyzpwg%40mwanda.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 20:28 Srishti Sharma
2017-10-04 11:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-04 13:39 ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall
2017-10-04 14:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-04 14:41 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2017-10-04 15:05 ` Srishti Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1710041641280.2815@hadrien \
--to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=srishtishar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®