From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v4] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 17:56:45 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711011748390.1942@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171025120940.15721-3-prarit@redhat.com>
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index b390ff76e58f..f4ab1edf4e24 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -124,8 +124,10 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
> u16 booted_cores;
> /* Physical processor id: */
> u16 phys_proc_id;
> - /* Logical processor id: */
> + /* Logical processor (package) id: */
> u16 logical_proc_id;
> + /* Physical package ID */
> + u16 phys_pkg_id;
How is this new field used aside of being written to and how is it
different from phys_proc_id? AFAICT, it's the same as all callers to
topology_update_package_map() are handing in cpu_data->phys_proc_id.
> +/**
> + * topology_phys_to_logical_pkg - Map a physical package id to a logical
> + *
> + * Returns logical package id or -1 if not found
> + */
> +int topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(unsigned int phys_pkg)
> +{
> + int log_pkg;
> +
> + for (log_pkg = 0; log_pkg < logical_packages; log_pkg++)
> + if (logical_to_physical_pkg_map[log_pkg] == phys_pkg)
> + return log_pkg;
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(topology_phys_to_logical_pkg);
....
> +
> + /* Allocate and copy a new array */
> + ltp_pkg_map_new = kmalloc(logical_packages * sizeof(u16), GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(!ltp_pkg_map_new);
> + if (logical_to_physical_pkg_map) {
> + memcpy(ltp_pkg_map_new, logical_to_physical_pkg_map,
> + logical_packages * sizeof(u16));
> + kfree(logical_to_physical_pkg_map);
> }
> - physical_to_logical_pkg[pkg] = new;
> + logical_to_physical_pkg_map = ltp_pkg_map_new;
This lacks serialization and is therefore broken against a concurrent
topology_phys_to_logical_pkg() call for obvious reasons. The current user
is probably safe, but this really needs to be fixed now.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-25 12:09 [PATCH 0/3 v4] Fix panic in logical packages calculation Prarit Bhargava
2017-10-25 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/3 v4] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cache logical pkg id in uncore driver Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-01 16:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-25 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/3 v4] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-01 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-11-03 14:53 ` Prarit Bhargava
2017-10-25 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1711011748390.1942@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®