From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Li Yang-r58472 <LeoLi@freescale.com>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, bryan.wu@analog.com,
TripleX Chung <xxx.phy@gmail.com>,
Maggie Chen <chenqi@beyondsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Chinese translation of Documentation/HOWTO
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:02:26 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706220950110.3593@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <989B956029373F45A0B8AF0297081890D83001@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net>
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
>
> So as I argued in a previous email, non-native English speakers tend to
> be more confused by the policies and processes. I also don't think it's
> necessary to translate the technical documents. To be a software
> developer, one has to be educated or experienced in technical terms.
> Technical discussion can be done without too much requirement to grammar
> and emotional expressing. The translated document of policies and
> processes will help these people to understand the process better and go
> smoother in the process.
I do agree.
I think that the policies and processes parts of the documentation are
things that make total sense to encourage translation of, because it's
entirely possible that those are interesting and valid even to the people
who aren't necessarily directly involved in the actual coding, and may
well be relevant to managers etc who may not be _directly_ involed with
the rest of the kernel developers.
In fact, I suspect pretty much any documentation (whether technical or
about processes and/or style) makes sense to have translated if the energy
and ability to do that exists. I suspect the "policies and processes"
kinds of docs make _more_ sense to translate initially, simply because
they are approachable on their own - but I certainly would never
discourage anybody from translating anything at all.
That said, I don't think that merging the result into the standard kernel
makes sense - like it or not, right now English ends up being required
to be part of actually getting things into the "standard" kernel, and as
such, at _some_ point there has to be a connection point that switches
over to English, and trying to make the translations be an in-kernel thing
is thus kind of pointless.
But as part of some "documentation site", it makes 100% sense.
And sometimes maybe the issue isn't even just about straight translations,
but also perhaps about explaining cultural differences that aren't
mentioned at all in the documentation, just because people in the west end
up taking certain things for granted and it doesn't "need" documenting..
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-22 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 14:40 Li Yang
2007-06-21 15:18 ` WANG Cong
2007-06-21 15:29 ` Eugene Teo
2007-06-21 16:23 ` Bryan Wu
2007-06-22 2:48 ` Rob Landley
2007-06-22 3:23 ` dave young
2007-06-22 5:33 ` Rob Landley
2007-06-22 6:07 ` dave young
2007-06-22 18:45 ` Rob Landley
2007-06-22 6:09 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-06-22 9:21 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-22 18:53 ` Rob Landley
2007-06-22 3:58 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-06-22 4:22 ` Bryan Wu
2007-06-22 5:12 ` WANG Cong
2007-06-22 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-06-22 17:16 ` Tomas Neme
2007-06-22 18:39 ` TripleX
2007-06-22 18:58 ` Li, Tong N
2007-06-22 21:00 ` Rob Landley
2007-06-22 19:11 ` Rob Landley
2007-06-23 4:53 ` WANG Cong
2007-06-28 17:53 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-29 18:22 ` Rob Landley
2007-06-22 5:29 ` Rob Landley
[not found] <a8e1da0706191858w73a453dfjf28895150af85cfe@mail.gmail.com>
2007-06-20 5:13 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-06-20 5:22 ` dave young
2007-06-20 5:57 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-19 14:21 Li Yang
2007-06-19 15:26 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-06-19 15:31 ` Greg KH
2007-06-17 19:19 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-24 16:34 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-24 16:43 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-19 15:36 ` WANG Cong
2007-06-19 16:14 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-06-20 5:09 ` WANG Cong
2007-06-20 2:52 ` Bryan Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.98.0706220950110.3593@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=LeoLi@freescale.com \
--cc=bryan.wu@analog.com \
--cc=chenqi@beyondsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=xxx.phy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®