From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:42:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0707031441480.9434@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070703213614.GA29175@atjola.homenet>
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.07.03 18:45:24 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Subject : OProfile issues
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/207
> > Submitter : Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
> > Handled-By : Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/392
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/20/275
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/20/276
> > Status : patches were suggested
>
> Andi said that one of the regression fixes wasn't critical for .22 and
> that he wants to do a stopgap for the other regression (my patch
> sucked), reverting the code to the .21 version. So you can drop the
> patches and/or me here.
Can you say which patch should be reverted. This thing really shouldn't
have gone on this long, I would have hopef we had the oprofile thing
sorted out already..
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-03 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-03 16:45 Michal Piotrowski
2007-07-03 20:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-03 21:36 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-07-03 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-07-03 22:12 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-07-03 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-04 1:12 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.98.0707031441480.9434@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®