From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 11:40:48 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707081138320.31544@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46912BF5.8080201@redhat.com>
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > notify_change() does *not* do permission checks for
> > ATTR_CTIME/MTIME/ATIME.
>
> Then I don't understand
>
> /* Check for setting the inode time. */
> if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MTIME_SET | ATTR_ATIME_SET)) {
> if (current->fsuid != inode->i_uid && !capable(CAP_FOWNER))
> goto error;
> }
>
> in inode_change_ok. This seems to me exactly like the check needed.
No it's not. It really allows only the _owner_ to change MTIME/ATIME.
And the thing is, other people _can_ change MTIME/ATIME, but only to the
current time!
This is why ATTR_MTIME_SET ("set it to a _specific_ time") is so different
from ATTR_MTIME ("set it to the _current_ time").
The former is for times() with times != NULL, and is strictly limited to
only the owner (or root).
The latter is a "anybody who can change the inode can implicitly also
change the inode timestamps, but only to the _current_ time".
In other words, the ATTR_A/MTIME_SET thing allows people to _lie_ about
the time, and only the owner is allowed to do that. Which is why they are
very different.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-08 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-08 5:14 2.6.22-rc6-mm1-cfs-v19 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (reproducable) Markus Trippelsdorf
2007-07-08 8:20 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-08 10:09 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2007-07-08 15:28 ` 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result Markus Trippelsdorf
2007-07-08 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-08 17:06 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-07-08 17:33 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2007-07-08 17:34 ` Al Viro
2007-07-08 17:41 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-07-08 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-08 18:24 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-07-08 18:31 ` Al Viro
2007-07-08 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-07-08 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-08 18:34 ` Al Viro
2007-07-08 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-08 18:51 ` Al Viro
2007-07-08 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-08 19:26 ` Al Viro
2007-07-08 18:19 ` Al Viro
2007-07-09 12:40 ` 2.6.22-rc6-mm1-cfs-v19 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (reproducable) Lenar Lõhmus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.999.0707081138320.31544@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®